
تعداد نشریات | 24 |
تعداد شمارهها | 457 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,546 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,140,961 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,326,229 |
شناسایی دلالتهای نظریه ارتباطگرایی در برنامهدرسی کارورزی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان و طراحی یک الگوی مطلوب | ||
مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 13، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 40، آبان 1403، صفحه 73-92 اصل مقاله (897.4 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/pma.2024.13212.3855 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
بهاره کاوه سامانی1؛ افسانه کلباسی* 2؛ اشرف میرحیدری2 | ||
1کارشناسی ارشد آموزش ابتدایی. دانشگاه فرهنگیان اصفهان. ایران | ||
2گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه فرهنگیان ، تهران. ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی دلالتهای نظریهی ارتباطگرایی در برنامهدرسی کارورزی دانشگاه فرهنگیان و طراحی یک الگوی مطلوب به روش آمیخته از نوع اکتشافی مرحله ای(کیفی- کمی) انجام شد. در بخش کیفی از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی قیاسی برای طراحی الگو و در بخش کمی از شیوه پیمایشی به منظور مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. جامعه آماری در بخش کیفی، اسناد و پژوهشهای معتبر در موضوع ارتباطگرایی بود که 14 پژوهش از طریق نمونهگیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. جامعه آماری در بخش کمی،70 نفر از مدرسان کارورزی رشته آموزش ابتدایی دانشگاه فرهنگیان اصفهان بودند که طبق جدول کرجسی و مورگان، 59 نفر از آنها بهصورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش در بخش کیفی، فهرست وارسی بر اساس عناصر برنامه درسی و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه محققساخته بود. نتایج نشان داد، از مهم ترین دلالت های نظریه ارتباط گرایی در اهداف برنامه درسی کارورزی، توانمندی در هدایت جریان آموزش به صورت حضوری و مجازی و تدریس مشارکتی بود. مهمترین مقوله در عنصر محتوا، دانش تحلیل محتوا و اقدام پژوهی بود. مهمترین مقوله در عنصر شیوههای تدریس، شیوه اکتشافی و حل مسئله و در عنصر شیوههای ارزشیابی، مشاهده عملکرد دانشجو معلمان در کلاس درس بود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
نظریه یادگیری؛ ارتباط گرایی؛ برنامه درسی؛ کارورزی؛ دانشگاه فرهنگیان | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Identifying the implications of connectivism theory in Internship curriculum at Farhangian University and designing a desirable model | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Bahareh Kaveh Samani1؛ afsaneh kalbasi2؛ ashraf mirheidary2 | ||
1Master of Elementary Education, Farhangian University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
2Department of educational sciences, Farhangian university, Tehran. iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The aim of present study was identifying the implications of the connectivism theory in the internship curriculum of Farhangian University and designing a suitable model using a mixed method of exploratory sequential type. In the qualitative part, Mayring's inductive qualitative content analysis method and in the quantitative part, the survey method were used to model the structural equations. In the qualitative section, authentic documents and researches on the topic of connectivism, of which 14 studies were selected through purposeful sampling. The statistical population in the quantitative section was 70 trainee teachers of which 59 were randomly selected according to Karjesi and Morgan's table. The research tool in the qualitative part was a checklist based on curriculum elements, and in the quantitative part, a researcher-made questionnaire. The results showed one of the most important implications of connectivism theory in the goals of the internship curriculum was the ability to direct the instruction in a face-to-face and virtual form and collaborative teaching. The most important category in content was the knowledge of content analysis and action research. The most important category in teaching methods was discovery and problem solving method and in evaluation methods was observing performance of student teachers in class. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
connectivism, learning theory؛ Curriculum, internship, Farhangian University | ||
مراجع | ||
Adibmanesh, M., Hemmati, A., & Namdari, M. (2022). Pathology of the teacher-researcher program as a research action and providing solutions to strengthen and expand it in the education system. Research in Curriculum Planning, 4 (19), 113-130. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2023.1968327.2229
AlDahdouh, A., Osorio, A., & Caires, S. (2015). Understanding Knowledge Network, Learning and Connectivism (2015). International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning,12(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.46186.
Asadpour, S., Assareh, A., Ahmadi, G., & Emamjome, S. M. (2022). Designing and validation of the context based curriculum model with emphasis on connectivism for teaching sciences. Curriculum Planning knowledge & research in Educational Sciences., 18(44), 197-216. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2022.1942886.2014
Asghari, F., Khademi, S., & Vesali, M. (2021). Similarities and Differences between Learning Theories: Behaviorism, Cognitivism and Constructivism, from the Perspective of Schunk. Research in Experimental Science Education, 1(1), 35-50. [In Persian].DOR: 20.1001.1.27834387.1400.1.1.6.9
Azimi, R., Namdari Pejman, M., & Hoseini, S. R. (2024). Analysis of the professional development process based on the life experiences of lesson studier teachers. Educational and Scholastic studies, 13(1), 37-53. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.48310/pma.2023.3129
Banihashem, S. K., & Aliabadi, K. (2017). Connectivism: Implications for Distance Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 8(3), 1-7. [In Persian]http://dx.doi.org/%2010.5812/ijvlms.10030
Barari, N., Moeini, A., Rezaei Zadeh, M., & Abbas Kasani, H. (2017). Future teacher; change in roles and tasks in the digital environments based on the Connectivism theory. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 11(2), 161-170. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2017.635
Downes, S. (2010). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. In H. Yang & S. Yuen (Eds.), Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking (1-26). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-729-4.ch001
Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 58-87. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6173510
Drexler, W. (2010). The Networked Student Model for Construction of Personal Learning Environments: Balancing Teacher Control and Student Autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1081
Ejtehadi, M., Ghourchian, N., & Mirzaei, N. (2017). Constructivism and Connectivism in E-Learning .Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 28 .5-30. [In Persian]. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1006360?FullText=FullText.
Eskandari, H., Fardanesh, H., & Sadeghzadeh Ghamsari, A. R. (2014). Contemporary Scientific Paradigms and Learning Theories. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 11(20), 1-32. [In Persian] .https://doi.org/ 10.22111/jeps.2014.2155.
Eskandari, H., Fardanesh, H., Sajadi, S., Sadeghzadeh Ghamsari, A., & Beheshti, S. (2011). Connectivism and explanation and critique of its epistemological basis. Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(3,4), 29-50. [In Persian]. https://education.scu.ac.ir/article_10283_c83953ac1a68f5feb1897f5bfd4a2a33.pdf
Fenoglio, P. J. (2006). ‘Pinball’ engagement and Connectivism: New understandings of learning in the 21st Century. Retrieved from https://exportquality.net/ESSAYS/PinballEngagement&Connectivism.pdf
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
Hamedinasab, S., & Ayati, M. (2017). Analysis of the Implications Connectivism Theory on the Elements of the Curriculum. Higher Education Letter, 10(37), 131-158. [In Persian]. https://journal.sanjesh.org/article_26656.html
Kultawanich, K., Koraneekij, P., & Na-Songkhla, J. (2015). Development and Validation of the Information Literacy Assessment in Connectivism Learning Environment for Undergraduate Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1386-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.764
Mirkamali, S. M., Pourkarimi, J., Farasatkhah, M., & Namdari Pejman, M. (2018). Designing a quality assurance model for student-teacher educational planning in Farhangian University. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 6(12), 65-88. [In Persian]https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2018.1786
Namdari Pejman, M., & Edvay, F. (2024). Conceptualization of "Captivity in the Trap of Knowledge" in Primary Teachers. Teacher Professional Development, 9(2), 1-21. [In Persian]https://doi.org/10.48310/tpd.2024.15693.1595
Namdari Pejman, M., Karimian, H., Heidari, H. (2015). The Comparative Study of Using Learning Theories in Instruction Process and its relationship with Mathematical Application Score's in Islamic Countries. Research in Curriculum Planning, 45(12), 108-118. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/898509
Pourkarimi, J., Seyfi, A., Ghaemi, F., & Namdari Pejman, M. (2022). Designing a Competency Model for Applicants of Primary Education Program at Farhangian University. Educational and Scholastic studies, 11(1), 17-46. [In Persian] DOR: 20.1001.1.2423494.1401.11.1.1.3
Rezaei, E., Zarei Zavaraki, S., Hatami, J., Aliabadi, K., & Delavar A. (2017). Development of MOOCs Instructional Design Model Based on Connectivism Learning Theory. Journal of Medical Sciences, 12 (1 and 2) :65-86. [In Persian]. http://jmed.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-779-fa.html
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., Hu, X. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Learning Analytics in Teacher Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 12, 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569.
Seyfi, A., Pourkarimi, J., & Namdari Pejman, M. (2023). Designing a model of professional competencies for internship mentore’s of Farhangian University. Educational and Scholastic studies, 12(4), 423-459. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.48310/pma.2023.3458
Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning theory or pastime of the self-amused. Retrieved from: http://www.Elearnspace.org/Articles/Connectivism_self-amused.htm
Siemens, G. (2009). Handbook of Emerging Technologies for Learning. University of Manitoba, Learning Technologies Centre.
Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, J. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the current state of distance, blended and online learning. Athabaska University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3515.8483
Tabrizi, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of analogical and inductive approaches. Social Sciences, 21(64), 105-138. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2014.344
Taghavinasab, S. N., Fouladcheng, M., & Karimi, M. H. (2016). The philosophy of education and deconstructive approach to traditional learning against the connectivism learning theory. The National Conference of the Philosophy of Education Association of Iran (philosophy of education and the realm of social and human sciences). Shiraz university. Iran. [In Persian]. https://sid.ir/paper/852149/fa.
Trna, J. & Trnova, E. (2013). Implementation of Connectivism in science teacher training. Journal of Education and Instructional Studies in the World, 3 (1), 191-196. Retrieved from:https://arastirmax.com/en/system/files/dergiler/116392/makaleler/3/1/arastrmx_116392_3_pp_191-196.pdf
Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 208 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 282 |