پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 548 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,318 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,058,512 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,651,668 |
نقش دانش محتوایی آموزش فنّاورانه در توسعة حرفه ای معلمان: یک مرور روایتی | ||
| پژوهش در مطالعات برنامه درسی تربیت معلم | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 4، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 7، اسفند 1403، صفحه 101-113 اصل مقاله (682.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/jcdr.2025.18644.1131 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فریبرز عرفانی زاده* 1؛ هانیه اولادیان2 | ||
| 1گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665 تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پیشینه و اهداف: توسعة حرفه ای معلم فرایندی مداوم است که از طریق آن معلمان متناسب با تواناییهای خود و نیازهای زمان در حال تغییر سازگار و به رشد خود ادامه میدهند. امروزه، توسعة معلمان، نه تنها شامل تسلط بر علم و تواناییهای تدریس بلکه با تسلط بر فنّاوری نیز به چالش کشیده میشود. یکی از ایده های نوآورانه برای ارتقای آموزش در قرن بیست و یکم، تجدید نظر در آموزش و توسعة برنامه درسی با ادغام فنّاوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات با دانش محتوایی آموزشی به شیوهای سیستماتیک است، این ادغام معلمان را قادر میسازد تا به طور مؤثّر ابزارها و منابع فنّاوری مدرن را در شیوههای تدریس خود بگنجانند و کیفیت کلی آموزش را افزایش دهند و دانشآموزان را برای نیازهای عصر دیجیتال آماده کنند. روشها: پژوهش حاضر مطالعه از نوع مرور روایتی است و با هدف بررسی و تحلیل نقش دانش محتوایی آموزش فنّاورانه در توسعة حرفهای معلمان انجام شد. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از مقالات علمی منتشر شده در پایگاههای اینترنتی استفاده شد. یافتهها: یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که دانش محتوایی آموزش فنّاورانه با ایجاد شایستگیهای در دانش فنّاورانه، دانش تربیتی و محتوا، دانش محتوایی تربیتی، دانش محتوای فنّاوری و دانش تربیتی فنّاوری، باعث درک و بازنمایی مناسب معلم از آموزش و تدریس همراه با استفاده از فنّاوری مناسب می شود. همچنین باعث ایجاد نقشهای متفاوتی برای معلمان و دگرگونی تجارب آموزشی و فرآیندهای آموزشی می شود. نتیجهگیری: در مجموع با توجه به یافته های پژوهش میتوان گفت که حرفهای شدن یک فرآیند مستمر از طریق مشارکت فعال در عمل است. معلمان نمیتوانند به تنهایی برای رسیدن به این هدف مبارزه کنند؛ اما باید از طرفهای مختلف حمایت شوند. از این رو سیستمهای آموزشی باید به دنبال فراهم کردن فرصتهایی برای معلمان برای توسعة حرفهای ضمن خدمت برای حفظ استاندارد بالای تدریس و حفظ نیروی کار معلم با کیفیت بالا باشند. دانش محتوایی آموزشی فنّاورانه یک نوع تخصّص منحصر به فرد است که باعث حرکت معلمان به سمت توسعه حرفه ای می شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| دانش محتوایی؛ آموزش فناورانه؛ توسعه حرفه ای؛ معلمان؛ مدارس | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The role of Technological pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' professional development: a narrative review | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fariborz Erfanizadeh1؛ Hanieh Aoladian2 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2M.A. Graduate in Educational Administration Bu-Ali Sina Hamadan University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background and Objectives: Teacher professional development is a continuous process through which teachers adapt and grow in accordance with their abilities and the needs of the changing times. Today, teacher development is not only about mastering science and teaching abilities, but also about mastering technology. One of the innovative ideas for improving education in the 21st century is to rethink education and curriculum development by integrating information and communication technology with educational content knowledge in a systematic way. This integration enables teachers to effectively incorporate modern technology tools and resources into their teaching practices, increase the overall quality of education, and prepare students for the needs of the digital age. Methods: The present study is a narrative review study and was conducted with the aim of investigating and analyzing the role of Technological pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' professional development. Scientific articles published on Internet databases were used to collect information. Findings: The research findings showed that Technological pedagogical content knowledge, by creating competencies in technological knowledge, educational knowledge and content knowledge, educational content knowledge, technological content knowledge and technological educational knowledge, leads to a teacher's appropriate understanding and representation of education and teaching along with the use of appropriate technology, and also creates different roles for teachers and transforms educational experiences and educational processes. Conclusion: Overall, according to the research findings, it can be said that professionalization is a continuous process through active participation in practice. Teachers cannot struggle alone to achieve this goal, but need to be supported by various parties. Hence, education systems should seek to provide opportunities for teachers to develop their professional skills in-service to maintain high standards of teaching and to retain a high-quality teacher workforce. Technological educational content knowledge is a unique type of expertise that drives teachers towards professional development. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Technological pedagogical, content knowledge, professional development, Teachers, school | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adipat, S., Chotikapanich, R., Laksana, K., Busayanon, K., Piatanom, P., Ausawasowan, A., & Elbasouni, I. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge for professional teacher development. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12. Akram, H., Raza, M., Jan, M. F., Aslam, S., & Nivin-Vargas, L. (2022). Identified leadership practices and teachers’ professional development in Karachi, Pakistan: the moderation effect of training. Education 3-13, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2146455 Amelia, D. P., Oktafianti, M., Genika, P. R., & Luthfia, R. A. (2023). Implementation of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal on Education, 5(2), 3001-3009. Bahtiar, B., Yusuf, Y., Doyan, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). The trend of technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) research in 2012-2022: Contribution to science learning of 21st century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 39-47. Bates, C. C., & Morgan, D. N. (2018). Seven elements of effective professional development. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 623-626. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1674. Bwalya, A., & Rutegwa, M. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy of pre-service science and mathematics teachers: A comparative study between two Zambian universities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 1-14. Cumming, C. (2011). CPD: Support strategies for professional learning, national initiatives and major curriculum reform. Improving Schools, 14(2), 145-155. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. De Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 1-15. Dunn, R., Hattie, J., & Bowles, T. (2019). Exploring the experiences of teachers undertaking educational design research (EDR) as a form of teacher professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 151ñ167. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical writing, 24(4), 230-235. Ginting, D., & Linarsih, A. (2022). Teacher professional development in the perspective of technology pedagogical content knowledge theoretical framework. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 1-10. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26(2), 91-108. Hennessy, S., D'Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. Ibda, H., Syamsi, I., & Rukiyati, R. (2023). Professional elementary teachers in the digital era: A systematic. Int J Eval & Res Educ, 12(1), 459-467. Jiménez Sierra, Á. A., Ortega Iglesias, J. M., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023, February). Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 8, p. 1078913). Kabilan, M. K., & Veratharaju, K. (2013). Professional development needs of primary school English-language teachers in Malaysia. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 330ñ351. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304. Li, S., & Akram, H. (2023). Do emotional regulation behaviors matter in EFL teachers' professional development? A process model approach. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (9), 273-291. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers’ college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Nkundabakura, P., Nsengimana, T., Uwamariya, E., Nyirahabimana, P., Nkurunziza, J. B., Mukamwambali, C., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2024). Contribution of Continuous Professional Development (CPD) Training Programme on Rwandan Secondary School Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Pedagogical, Technological, and Content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4969-4999. Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational research, 54(4), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725 Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663 Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 1-8. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 47-63. Su, Y. (2023). Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon, 9(6), 1-7. Uştuk, Ö. & De Costa, P. I. (2021). Reflection as meta-action: Lesson study and EFL teacher professional development. TESOL Journal, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.531 Wong, J. T., Bui, N. N., Fields, D. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2023). A learning experience design approach to online professional development for teaching science through the arts: Evaluation of teacher content knowledge, self-efficacy and STEAM perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(6), 593-623. Yenen, E. T., & Yöntem, M. K. (2020). Teachers’ professional development needs: AQ method analysis. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 159-176. Yue, M., Jong, M. S. Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2024). Understanding K–12 teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-32. Zhang, H., & Luo, S. (2022). Facilitating EFL teachers’ professional development through CLS of English literature instruction. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(2), 60-72. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 708 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 437 |
||