| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 499 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,884 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,894,001 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,807,790 |
ارزشیابی برنامه درسی ریاضی رشته کارشناسی علوم تربیتی گرایش آموزش ابتدایی دانشگاه فرهنگیان از منظر نومعلمان | ||
| پژوهش در مطالعات برنامه درسی تربیت معلم | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 8، شهریور 1404، صفحه 104-123 اصل مقاله (848.25 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/jcdr.2025.19311.1181 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نوروز هاشمی* 1؛ علی حسینی خواه2؛ حمیدرضا کاشفی1 | ||
| 1گروه آموزش ریاضی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889 14665، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی (دانشگاه تربیت معلم)، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پیشینه و اهداف: با توجه به اهمیت دروس ریاضی دورة ابتدایی در آموزش یک جامعه و تأثیرگذار بودن آن در رشد و بالندگی چندین نسل از جامعه و اهمیت تدریس و یادگیری آن ها، این پژوهش به ارزشیابی برنامة درسی ریاضی رشتة کارشناسی علوم تربیتی دانشگاه فرهنگیان از دید نومعلمان از منظر الگوی ارزشیابی CIPP پرداخته است. روشها: این پژوهش به روش آمیخته و با ابزار پرسشنامه های بسته پاسخ بر اساس مقیاس لیکرت، پرسشنامه باز پاسخ با شرکت 417 نفر از نومعلمان که به صورت تصادفی طبقهای انتخاب شده بودند، انجام گرفته است. روش کیفی اکتشافی برای مشخص کردن محتوای پرسشنامة بسته پاسخ و تحلیل کمی پیمایشی و آزمون T تک متغییره برای تحلیل پرسشنامه های بسته پاسخ برای 417 نفر، و روش دلفی برای تحلیل پرسشنامه باز پاسخ که به صورت هدفمند از 126 نفر نومعلم به عمل آمد مورد استفاده واقع شد. یافتهها: یافته های پژوهش در بعد کمی و کیفی نشان از نامطلوب بودن برنامة درسی مورد نظر از دید شرکت کنندگان در پژوهش است. میانگین پایین و وجود اختلاف معنادار آن با معیار مطلوبیت در تمام مراحل زمینه، برونداد، فرایند و برونداد حاکی از نامناسب بودن نتیجه ارزشیابی این برنامه دارد. عدم شفافیت در اهداف، نبود تناسب بین امکانات آموزش ریاضی و تعداد دانشجو، کمبود منابع درسی ریاضی، عدم تسلط بر تدریس تمام مفاهیم ریاضی در پایان تحصیل از اهم مواردی بود که توسط شرکت کنندگان بیان شد. نتیجهگیری: با توجه به یافته های این پژوهش به نظر می رسد برنامةدرسی ریاضی رشته کارشناسی علوم تربیتی نیازمند بازنگری جدی در زمینه، درونداد، فرایند و برونداد است. همچنین، تفکیک رشتة کارشناسی علوم تربیتی گرایش آموزش ابتدایی به گرایش های علوم انسانی و علوم پایه و تقویت دروس عملی و حذف دروس موازی از پیشنهادات این پژوهش است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارزشیابی؛ نومعلمان؛ آموزش ابتدایی؛ رنامهی درسی ریاضی؛ دانشگاه فرهنگیان؛ الگوی سیپ | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of the Mathematics Curriculum of the Bachelor of Educational Sciences Major in Elementary Education at Farhangian University from the Perspective of New Teachers | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nourooz Hashemi1؛ Ali Hosseini Khah2؛ Hamidreza Kashefi1 | ||
| 1Department of Mathematics Education, Farhangian University, P. O. Box 14665 889 Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Psychology & Education, Kharazmi University (Teacher Training University), Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background and Objectives: Considering the importance of elementary mathematics courses in educating a society and their impact on the growth and development of several generations of society, and the importance of teaching and learning them, this study evaluated the mathematics curriculum of the Bachelor of Education Sciences program at Farhangian University from the perspective of new teachers using the CIPP evaluation model. Methods: This research was conducted using a mixed method and using closed-ended questionnaires based on the Likert scale and open-ended questionnaires, with the participation of 417 newly graduated teachers who were randomly selected in a stratified sampling method. Quantitative survey method and univariate T-test were used to analyze the closed-ended questionnaires, and the Delphi method was used to analyze the open-ended questionnaire that was purposefully administered to 126 newly graduated teachers. Findings: The quantitative and qualitative findings of the research indicate that the curriculum in question is undesirable from the perspective of the participants of the study. The low average and the existence of a significant difference with the criterion of desirability in all stages of the context, output, process, and outcome indicate that the evaluation result of this program is inappropriate. Lack of clarity in the goals, lack of proportion between the facilities for teaching mathematics and the number of students, lack of mathematics teaching resources, and lack of mastery of teaching all mathematical concepts at the end of the study were among the most important issues expressed by the participants. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, it seems that the mathematics curriculum of the Bachelor of Education degree program requires serious revision in terms of content, input, process, and output. Also, the separation of the Bachelor of Education degree program of the elementary education major into the humanities and basic sciences majors, strengthening practical courses, and eliminating parallel courses are among the suggestions of this study. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Evaluation, New Teachers, Elementary Education, Mathematics Curriculum, Farhangian University, CIPP Model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Adib, Y., fathiazar, E., & Arefnajad, S. (2017). Professional Identity of Teachers from the Perspective of Student Teachers of Farhangian University of East Azerbaijan Province. Teacher Education Policy, 1(1), 147-162. [In Persian]. Ahmadian, H., Maleki, H., Eskandari, Hossein, Musapour, N., & Sadeghi, A. (2022). Identifying and explaining interpersonal and social communication problems of second year elementary school students in Tehran from the perspective of teachers. Journal of Education, 149(38), 9-26. [In Persian]. Alimohammadi, G., Jabbary, N., & Niazazari, K. (2019). Professional empowerment of teachers in the future perspective along with a model. Journal of Educational Innovations, 18(1), 7-32. [In Persian]. Almasi, H. A., Zarei Zwarki, A., Nili, M., & Delavar, A. (2017). Evaluation of the fourth internship curriculum at Farhangian University based on Tyler's goal oriented evaluation model. Journal of Research in Teaching, 5(1), 1-24. [In Persian]. Bazargan Harandi, A. (2008). Mixed Method Research Design: A Preferable Approach in Management Studies. Management Knowledge, 21(81), 19-36. [In Persian]. Borna Khajeh, M., Mahmoodi, F., Adib, Y., & Habibi, H. (2022). Studying the process of primary schools teachers' resistance towards formal curriculum. Journal of Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 10(19), 373-408. [In Persian]. Cattley, G. (2007). Emergence of professional identity for the pre service teacher. International Education Journal, 8(2), 337-347. Cochran, W. G. (1940). Note on an approximate formula for the significance levels of z. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(1), 93-95. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dehghan, A., Mehram, B., & Karami, M. (2016). Evaluation of Farhangian University Curriculum in terms of training research teachers (Case: Shahid Beheshti and Shahid Hasheminejad Campuses). Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 7(13), 78-100. [In Persian]. Eghtesadi, A. R., & Nodehi, F. (2023). Evaluation of the Non continuous Bachelor’s Programs at Farhangian University Based on CIPP Model. Educational and Scholastic studies, 11(4), 7-30. [In Persian]. Faraji, N. (2006). Descriptive and Inferential Statistics. Pouran Pahoejosh Publishing House, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]. Ghaaderi, M., Bolandhemmataan, K., Havaasbeigi, F., & Babakaani S. (2018). Elementary School Teachers’ Life Experience with the Challenges of Teaching in Farsi in Bilingual Areas. Journal of Education, 34(1), 95-114. [In Persian]. Gregory, T. R. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution, Education and Outreach, 1(2), 121-137. Habibi, A., & Sarabadani, M. (2023). SPSS Practical Training. Naroon Publishing, Tehran, Iran. Hung, S. T. A. (2012). A washback study on e portfolio assessment in an English as a Foreign Language teacher preparation program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 21-36. Ibrokhimovich, F. J., & Mirzaxolmatovnia, X. Z. (2022). The Most Important Role of Mathematics in Primary School. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(3), 652-655. Iman, M. T., & Noshadi, M. R. (2011). Qualitative Content Analysis. Research, 3(2), 15-44. [In Persian]. Izadi, M., Abbaspour, M. H., & Esmaeli, A. (2016). The challenges Facing Primary School Teachers of Kuhbanan in the implementation of descriptive evaluation plan. Theory and Practice in Teachers Education, 2(2), 73-88. [In Persian]. jalali, R. (2013). Qualitative research Sampling. Qualitative research in health sciences, 1(4), 310-320. [In Persian]. Kabiri, M. (2021). Measurement of mathematical pedagogical content knowledge of third grade teachers. Teacher Education Policy, 4(3), 95-112. [In Persian]. Keshavarz S., & Moghaddisi, Z. (2018). Explaining the components of the teacher training system according to the developmental documents of the formal and public education system. Family and Research Quarterly, 15(3), 7-30. [In Persian]. Keykhanezhad, M., Sanchouli, M., & Behradfar, B. (2017). Evaluation of Farhangian University Curriculum Elements Based on Upstream Documents: A Case Study of Campuses in Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Teacher Professional Development, 1(3), 7-26. [In Persian]. Kiamanesh, A. (2002). Educational Evaluation Methods. Payam Noor Publications, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Korthagen, F. A. (2016). Pedagogy of teacher education. In International handbook of teacher education: Volume 1 (pp. 311-346). Singapore: Springer Singapore. Koushki, F., Ghaderi, M., Khosravi, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2020). Content Analysis of the Syllabus of ICT Application Courses in the field of Primary Education at Farhangian University based on the TPACK model. New Educational Approaches, 15(1), 59-78. [In Persian]. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610. Mahmoodi Boorang, M., & Nabaee, H. (2019). Factors Affecting Teacher Professional Identity: A Systematic Review. Teacher Professional Development, 4(1), 77-94. [In Persian]. Mehrmohammadi, M. (2013). Teacher Education Curriculum and Its Collaborative Implementation Model: A Transformative Strategy for Teacher Education in Iran. Journal of Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 1(1), 5-26. [In Persian]. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. Miller, P. H. (2011). Theories of developmental psychology (5th Ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. Mobini Dehkurdi, A. (2011). Introduction to Designs and Models in Mixed Research Methods. Rahbord, 20(60), 217-234. [In Persian]. Mohammadabadi, M., & Kord Firuzjaea, F. (2025). Presenting a Model of Spiritual Capital Components among First Grade Elementary School Teachers (A Qualitative Study). Journal of research in Curriculum Studies, 5(1), 1-17. [In Persian]. Mohebi Amin, A., Behradfar, A., Khoshsima, M., & Moghimirad, M. (2022). Analysis of the Situation of Farhangian University Based on the Lived Experiences of Graduates: Qualitative Research. Research in Teacher Education, 5(2), 1-32. [In Persian]. Mousavi Asl, S., & Tarebari, H. (2024). Synthesis of Learners' Educational Needs in the Process of Lesson Planning and Teaching of Teachers. Journal of Research in Curriculum Studies, 3(2), 28-42. [In Persian]. Mousavi, S. (2020). Investigating the Relationship between the Application Curriculum Innovations and Metacognitive Skills in Elementary Teachers. Journal of Education Studies, 6(23), 67-80. [In Persian]. Mousavi, S. (2024). Identifying and explaining the underlying factors of curriculum based on resilience and skills needed by primary school teachers. Journal of research in curriculum studies, 3(2), 83-100. [In Persian]. Nikjoo, Z., Parsabhmanyari, S. F., & Jamalianzadeh, S. B. (2019). The Role of the Primary Teacher in Education. The Sixth National Conference on Knowledge and Technology of Educational Sciences, Social Studies and Psychology of Iran, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]. Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A., Riasati, M. J., & Maata, R. L. (2020). Educational program and curriculum evaluation models: a mini systematic review of the recent trends. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4048-4055. Papageorgiou, V. (2022). A study of primary school teachers’ tendencies regarding the usefulness of dramatization in the educational process. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 10(2), 145-162. Rezapour Mirsaleh, Y., Pourabedini Ardakani, M., & Mousavi Nodushan, S. (2016). Effect of Teacher Locus of Control, Teacher Self Efficacy in Classroom Management and Discipline, and Teaching Self Efficacy on Classroom Climate among Primary School Teachers. New Educational Approaches, 11(1), 125-145. [In Persian]. Roshanghias, P., Liaghatdar, M. J., Zamani, B., & Sharifian, F. (2020). Assessment of the Status of the Content Element in the Curriculum Implemented in the Undergraduate Course: Lifelong Learning Approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(58), 9-40. [In Persian]. Staffelbeam, D. l. (2007). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist: A tool for applying the CIPP Model to assess long term enterprises. Available from www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists./ Stufflebeam, D. L., & Webster, W. J. (1983). An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation, 23-43. Tabrizi, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of deductive and inductive approaches. Social Sciences, 21(64), 105-138. [In Persian]. Tahmasebzadeh Sheikhlar, D., Azimpoor, E., & Sheikhi, M. (2019). Examining the Impact of Causal Effect of Core Self Evaluation, Job Autonomy and Occupational Hardiness on Teachers Job Performance. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 9(25), 199-228. [In Persian]. Tarin, H., Naderi, N., & Heidari Sureshjani, N. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of in service training courses based on the SIP model at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Higher Education Letter, 40(10), 27-50. [In Persian]. Voinea, M., Pălăşan, T. (2014). Teachers’ professional identity in the 21st century Romania. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 361-365. Yekta, M. R., & Heydari, S. (2021). Lived experience of non profit school teachers in Isfahan from the problems of elementary school students in online classes during the outbreak of coronavirus. Applied Educational Leadership, 2(3), 23-30. [In Persian]. Zareee Zovaraki, E., Zamani, S. G. and Tahaee, Z. (2017). Human rights education before higher education and in elementary school. International Relations Researches, 7(24), 265-285. [In Persian]. Zavvar, T., Abdollahiasl, S., Bahari, P., & Delkhosh, V. (2022). Lived Experience of Teachers From Teaching Multi Grade Classrooms. Research in Teaching, 10(2), 112-143. [In Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 150 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 109 |
||