پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 556 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,414 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,328,406 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,818,155 |
The effect of the mobile learning–based PhET interactive simulation approach on students’ conceptual learning and creative thinking in the concept of solutions | ||
| پژوهش در آموزش شیمی | ||
| مقاله 20، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 30، تیر 1405، صفحه 61-81 اصل مقاله (749.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/chemedu.2025.21495.1388 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zakyeh Akrami* 1؛ Mahdiyeh Rahmanipoor2 | ||
| 1Department of Chemistry Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Chemistry Teacher, The Education Department of Yasooj, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background and Objective: This study aimed to examine the impact of the Mobile Learning–based PhET Interactive Simulation (ML-PhET) approach on conceptual learning and creative thinking among tenth-grade students studying solutions. By combining mobile learning with PhET simulations, the ML-PhET approach offers an innovative framework for chemistry education that emphasizes self-directed, interactive, and experiential learning. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed, featuring pretest, posttest, and follow-up assessments. The participants were tenth-grade female students from Isfahan during the 2024–2025 academic year. Data collection involved a researcher-developed academic achievement test to evaluate Bloom’s four cognitive domains and a creativity questionnaire based on Guilford’s model. Experts in chemistry and educational sciences confirmed the content validity of both instruments, and their reliability coefficients, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. Data analysis utilized Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests, with Bonferroni correction applied. Findings: The ML-PhET approach significantly enhanced students’ performance across Bloom’s cognitive domains, including Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, and Analysis, with these effects persisting even after 60 days. Notable improvements were also found in the creativity components of Fluency, Originality, and Sensitivity, while Flexibility and Elaboration showed no significant change. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the ML-PhET approach effectively enhances both conceptual learning and creative thinking, providing a practical and innovative alternative to traditional chemistry instruction. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Chemistry education؛ conceptual learning؛ creative thinking؛ mobile learning؛ PhET Interactive Simulation؛ STEM | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The effect of the mobile learning–based PhET interactive simulation approach on students’ conceptual learning and creative thinking in the concept of solutions | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zakyeh Akrami1؛ Mahdiyeh Rahmanipoor2 | ||
| 1Department of Chemistry Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Chemistry Teacher, The Education Department of Yasooj, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background and Objective: This study aimed to examine the impact of the Mobile Learning–based PhET Interactive Simulation (ML-PhET) approach on conceptual learning and creative thinking among tenth-grade students studying solutions. By combining mobile learning with PhET simulations, the ML-PhET approach offers an innovative framework for chemistry education that emphasizes self-directed, interactive, and experiential learning. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed, featuring pretest, posttest, and follow-up assessments. The participants were tenth-grade female students from Isfahan during the 2024–2025 academic year. Data collection involved a researcher-developed academic achievement test to evaluate Bloom’s four cognitive domains and a creativity questionnaire based on Guilford’s model. Experts in chemistry and educational sciences confirmed the content validity of both instruments, and their reliability coefficients, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. Data analysis utilized Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests, with Bonferroni correction applied. Findings: The ML-PhET approach significantly enhanced students’ performance across Bloom’s cognitive domains, including Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, and Analysis, with these effects persisting even after 60 days. Notable improvements were also found in the creativity components of Fluency, Originality, and Sensitivity, while Flexibility and Elaboration showed no significant change. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the ML-PhET approach effectively enhances both conceptual learning and creative thinking, providing a practical and innovative alternative to traditional chemistry instruction. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Chemistry education, conceptual learning, creative thinking, mobile learning, PhET Interactive Simulation, STEM | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akgün, A. (2009). The Relation between Science Student Teachers’ Misconceptions about Solution, Dissolution, Diffusion and their Attitudes toward Science with their Achievement. Education and Science, 34(154), 26-36. https://educationandscience.ted.org.tr/article/view/835 Akrami, Z. & Shirvani, M. (2025). Deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ chemistry learning and engagement: Smartphone-created multimodal artifacts, Journal of Chemical Education, 102, 5218-5228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01424 Akrami, Z. (2022). The effectiveness of education with the STEM approach in the development of entrepreneurial thinking in chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00011C Akrami, Z.; Amani, V.; Bavardi, J. (2025). Identifying key components and objectives of mobile learning in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education Technology, 34, 367–383; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10196-8 Aliyu, H. (2025). A review of instructional strategies for maximizing the effectiveness of PhET interactive simulations in chemistry education. Rima International Journal of Education, 4(1), 479-487. Alt, D., Naamati-Schneider, L., & Weishut, D.J. (2023). Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education, 48, 1901 - 1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203 Alwafi, E. M. (2025). The impact of AI-assisted peer review on students’ AI-feedback literacy, motivation and self-esteem: Integrating experiential learning and self-determination theory, Learning and Motivation, 92, 102215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102215 Azamat, J. (2023). The role of research and innovation in developing chemistry education. Research in Chemistry Education, 5(3), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.48310/chemedu.2023.3197 Buhera, R., Ayu, S. B., & Nurohman, S. (2024). Enhancing students’ science process skills through design worksheet-based inquiry integrated PhET simulation on acid and base material. Journal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 8(3), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v8i3.39762 Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90, 499 - 541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544 Clark, T. M. (2024). Using multiple PhET sims to investigate greenhouse gases within a real-world context. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(10), 4242-4250. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00551 Clark, T. M., & Chamberlain, J. M. (2014). Use of a PhET interactive simulation in general chemistry laboratory: Models of the hydrogen atom. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1198-1202. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400454p Cronbach, L. J. & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(3), 391–418; https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404266386 Diab, H., Daher, W., Rayan, B., Issa, N., & Rayan, A. (2024). Transforming science education in elementary schools: The power of phet simulations in enhancing student learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105 Doronina, N., Lazorenko, L., & Andriichuk, T. (2024). Enhancing the practical learning of english: Applying Bloom's Taxonomy to the ESP curriculum for students of higher education institutions. Economics & Education, 9(3), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2024-3-2 Elendu, C., Amaechi, D.C., Okatta, A.U., Amaechi, E.C., Elendu, T.C., Ezeh, C.P., & Elendu, I.D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine, 103(27), e38813. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813 Fadillah, M. A., Hirahmah, A., & Fitri, N. C. (2025). Mobile learning media and physics education: Exploring student preferences, competence, and motivation in the digital era. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 5(2), 1437-1448. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.002 Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. Hurst, G. A., Quiroz-Martínez, D., & Wissinger, J. E. (2025). Chemistry education for climate empowerment and action. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(4), 1349-1351. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00306 Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G* Power software. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 18, 1149215. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17 Kizito, I. G., & Hassan, S. (2024). PhET interactive simulations as an effective tool for teaching chemistry: A review. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 12(2), 166-169. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4005084 Kizito, I.G., & Hassan, S. (2024). PhET interactive simulations as an effective tool for teaching chemistry: A review. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research 12(2), 166-169. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4104_2 Lamb, R.L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behaviour, 80, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.040 Levin, R. L.; Rubin, D. S.; Siddiqui, M. H. & Rastogi, S. Statistics for Management, 8nd ed.; Pearson: India. 2017. Maesaroh, N., & Sutikno, P. Y. (2025). Effectiveness of the PhET simulation assisted by songs to improve students critical thinking skills in electrical circuits. Journal Pijar Mipa, 20(2), 356-364. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v20i2.8729 Moore, E. B., Chamberlain, J. M., Parson, R., & Perkins, K. K. (2014). PhET interactive simulations: Transformative tools for teaching chemistry. Journal of chemical education, 91(8), 1191-1197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4005084 Moradi, R., & Arasteh Saleh Kohi, M. (2023). Enriching the learning environment based on mobile technologies and investigating its impact on students' learning and academic engagement in chemistry. New Educational Approaches, 18(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.22108/nea.2023.136616.1868 Ndagijimana, J. B., Musengimana, J., Mushimiyimana, H., Mukama, E., Habimana, O., Manirakiza, P., ... & Lakin, E. (2025). Contribution of an instructional module incorporating PhET simulations to Rwandan students' knowledge of chemical reactions, acids, and bases through social interactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 26(1), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RP00105B Nuraida, O., Akbar, G. S., Farida, I., & Rahmatullah, S. (2021). Using PhET simulation to learning the concept of acid-base. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012020 Penelitian, J.H., Pendidikan, P., Samitra, D., Firdaus, M.L., & Krisnawati, Y.K. (2023). Physics education technology project (PhET): Interactive simulation to improve students' understanding of concepts and perceptions. Journal Pedagogy. 10(3), 646-654. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v10i3.7879 Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of PhET simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966 Sayaf, A.M. (2023). Adoption of E-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education, Heliyon, 9, e13014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13014 Sequeira, C. A. & Borges, E. M. (2024). Enhancing statistical education in chemistry and STEAM using JAMOVI. Part 2. Comparing dependent groups and principal component analysis (PCA). Journal of Chemical Educucation, 101(11), 5040–5049; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00342 Sharifati S., Nili Ahmad Abadi M.R. & Maghami H. (2021). The effect of simulation chemistry training on spatial ability and problem-solving skills for tenth year female students in Tehran. Education Strategy Medicine Science, 14 (2), 28-38. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-2396-fa.html Sharifzadeh, F., & Ahmadabadi, Z. (2025). Improving the learning of subatomic structures through the use of technology and educational-participatory games for first period of high school students. Research in Chemistry Education, https://doi.org/10.48310/chemedu.2025.18115.1301 Sharifzadeh, F., & Ahmadabadi, Z. (2025). Improving the learning of subatomic structures through the use of technology and educational-participatory games for junior high school students. Research in Chemistry Education, 49-66. https://doi.org/10.48310/chemedu.2025.18115.1301 Simanjuntak, M.P., Hutahaean, J., Marpaung, N., & Ramadhani, D. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based learning combined with computer simulation on students' problem-solving and creative thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 519-534. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14330a Siswanto, D. A. C., Iswanto, B. H., & Rahmawati, Y. (2025). The impact of mobile learning on physics education: A systematic literature review. Journal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.11102 Suparman, A.R., Rohaeti, E., & Wening, S. (2024). Student misconception in chemistry: A systematic literature review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 238-252. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.28 Talanquer, V. (2022). The complexity of reasoning about and with chemical representations. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2(12), 2658-2669. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00498 Yasin, R.M., & Yunus, N. (2014). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of creativity approaches in technology and engineering education. Asian Social Science, 10, 242-252. https://doi.org/10.5539/ASS.V10N3P242 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 730 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 335 |
||
