انقلابی در بازنمایی‌های چندگانه هندسی و توسعه برنامه‌درسی ریاضی: تأثیر نرم‌افزار اتوگراف بر مفاهیم حجم و مساحت

Alamiyan, V., & Khalilzadeh, R. (2024). The effect of using multiple representations on mathematics teachers’ instruction based on SOLO theory in the topic of equation and linear equation. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, 10(18), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.48310/itt.2025.3964 [In Persian]

Akbari, Z. A., & Pourkrimi, J. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Curriculum Design: A Meta-Synthesis Study. JCDR, 7-1130. [In Persian]

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). Technology-enabled mathematics education: Optimising student engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351581

Bach, C. C., Bergqvist, E., & Jankvist, U. T. (2024). Students’ dynamic communication while transforming mathematical representations in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(3), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01575-x

Battista, M. T. (2004). Applying cognition-based assessment to elementary school students’ development of understanding of area and volume measurement. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_6

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. Academic Press.

Birgin, O., & Acar, H. H. (2018). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning on students’ achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 874–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1418917

Cross, A., Moscardini, A. O., & Thorp, J. (1982). Interactive computer simulation tools for use in teaching mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 13(6), 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739820130609

Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402.

Dahiana, W. O., Herman, T., & Nurlaelah, E. (2022). Representation thinking tool of a student in mathematical problems solving. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2468, 070066. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0129817

Fitrianna, A. Y., Dinia, S., Mayasari, M., & Nurhafifah, A. Y. (2018). Mathematical representation ability of senior high school students: An evaluation from students’ mathematical disposition. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5387

French, D. (2004). Teaching and learning geometry: Issues and methods in mathematical education. Continuum.

Goldin, G., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 1–23). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Graham, A. (2006). Developing thinking in statistics. Paul Chapman Publishing.

Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.

Hidayat, A., Aminah, N. S., & Masriyah, M. (2022). Analysis of Think-Pair-Share assisted by Autograph to foster students' mathematical problem solving ability. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(12), 1749–1756. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i12.4186

Hohenwarter, J., & Lavicza, Z. (2007). Presenting and implementing dynamic mathematics software: GeoGebra and the International GeoGebra Institute. In TSG 16: Research and development in the teaching and learning of calculus. ICME-11, Monterrey, Mexico.

Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, N.-S., Dung, J.-J., & Yang, Y.-L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191–212.

Kaput, J. J. (1986). Information technology and mathematics: Opening new representational windows (Technical Report No. ETC-86-3). Educational Technology Center, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Karnasih, I., & Sinaga, M. (2014). Integration of Autograph in improving mathematical problem solving and mathematical connection ability using cooperative learning Think-Pair-Share. In Proceedings of the Southeast Asian Conference on Innovation and Technology for Mathematics and Mathematics Education (pp. 85–102). SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics.

Lesh, R., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models in applied mathematical problem-solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 263–343). Academic Press.

Lestari, D., Usman, U., & Munzir, S. (2024). Mathematical representation abilities and self-confidence through application of discovery learning model with Geogebra-assisted. In R. Johar et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (AICMSTE 2023) (pp. 98–106). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-216-3_11

Moayeri, M., & Amiripour, P. (2025). Effective Quality of Teachers Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Implementing Guided Discovery Learning in Elementary Education. JCDR, 1136.

Mohammadi, A., & Abbasi, Z. (2023). Investigating the improvement of the understanding of the 7th level and volume of mathematics based on the use of technology in teaching. Research in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.48310/rme.2024.16969.1089 [In Persian]

Moharomah, I., & Irawati, S. (2021). Improving mathematical understanding and motivation of students through contextual learning approaches using Autograph software. JIPMat: Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 6(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v6i2.9012

Motamedi, A. (2024). A systematic approach to the innovations in curriculum planning approaches and their role in education and upbringing. Journal of research in curriculum studies, 4(1), 81-94. [In Persian]

Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_6

Pittalis, M. (2021). Extending the technology acceptance model to evaluate teachers’ intention to use dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(9), 1385–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1766139

Rocha, H. (2025). Knowledge to teach mathematics with technology: The Global Model. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2483488

Sari, L., Syahputra, E., & Surya, E. (2020). Development of Autograph-based learning tools to improve mathematical communication skills students in vocational high school. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(8), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i8.1880

Sinaga, I. K. M. (2014). Enhancing mathematical problem solving and mathematical connection through the use of dynamic software Autograph in cooperative learning Think-Pair-Share. SAINSAB, 17, 51–71.

Sinaga, Y. R., Syahputra, E., Ahyaningsih, F., & Saragih, S. H. B. (2018). The effect of cooperative learning type Think Pair Share with Autograph on the mathematical representation ability and self-efficacy. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 1481–1486. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-11-6

Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2024). Improving mathematical problem-solving abilities through Think Pair Share learning using Autograph. KnE Social Sciences, 9(8), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15583

Suryana, A. (2014). Improving mathematical representation skill by using PACE model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2014) (pp. ME–79–ME–84). Yogyakarta State University.

Yaftian, N., & Bazouki, L. (2021). Students’ challenges with shape-based concepts in geometry. Rahbordhā-ye Novin-e Tarbiat-e Moalleman, 7(11), 47–65. [In Persian]

Yaftian, Y., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). Multiple representations in the 10th grade mathematics textbook: Theory and practice in teacher education. Lesson Study in Mathematics Education, 8(14), 141–160. [In Persian]

Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2020). Examining mathematical technological knowledge of pre-service middle grades teachers with Geometer’s Sketchpad in a geometry course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1650302

Nelissen, J. M. C., & Tomic, W. (1998). Representations in mathematics education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED428950). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED428950.pdf

Thomas, M. O. J. (2008). Conceptual representations and versatile mathematical thinking [Conference paper]. ResearchGate.

Puentedura, R. R. (2006). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Hippasus. http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/10/02/SAMR_ABriefIntroduction.pdf

McLeod, D. B., & Adams, V. M. (1979). The interaction of field independence with discovery learning in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Education, 48(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1979.11011710

Friedman, M. (2000). Geometry, construction and intuition in Kant and his successors. In G. Sher & R. L. Tieszen (Eds.), Between logic and intuition: Essays in honor of Charles Parsons (pp. 186–218). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570681.010

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Trans.; V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.