پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 535 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,204 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,677,127 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,344,883 |
تمرکز محتوای کتاب درسی و راهنمای معلم علوم تجربی ششم ابتدایی و تسلط معلمان بر مهارتهای فرآیند علمی | ||
| مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 14، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 45، دی 1404، صفحه 223-237 اصل مقاله (597.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/pma.2025.16715.4490 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| احسان علی نیا بنگر* 1؛ محمدرضا نیلی احمد آبادی2؛ مهدی واحدی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در قرن معاصر بکارگیری مهارتهای فرآیند علمی برای یادگیری مادامالعمر حیاتی است. با این حال، در کشور ما وضعیت آموزش مهارتها و تسلط معلمان بر آنها نامشخص است. از این رو هدف مطالعه حاضر شناسایی وضعیت موجود آموزش مهارتهای فرآیند علمی است. در ابتدا طرح کدگذاری مهارتهای دوازدهگانه تدوین و تحلیل محتوای کتاب درسی علوم تجربی پایه ششم ابتدایی چاپ 1403-1402 و راهنمای معلم مربوط چاپ 1393-1392 با واحد ثبت مضمون و روش آنتروپی شانون انجام شد. سپس پرسشنامهی محقق ساخته شامل 25 سؤال بر اساس طیف لیکرت بین 92 نفر از معلمان ششم ابتدایی شهرستان بابلسر که به روش نمونهگیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند، توزیع گردید. روایی ابزار تحلیل محتوا و پرسشنامه از طریق نظرات اساتید گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی اعتبارسنجی شد و پایایی تحلیل محتوا با مقادیر کاپا بین 627/0 و 871/0 و پرسشنامه با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 82/0 تائید گردید. برای آمار استنباطی نیز از آزمون نرمالیته کولموگروف-اسمیرنف و تی زوجی استفاده شد. طبق نتایج بدست آمده، بیشترین توجه کتاب درسی، کتاب راهنمای معلم و معلمان به مهارتهای تعریف عملیاتی و رابطه مکان و زمان بوده و مهارتهای ارتباطات و استنتاج نسبتاً کمتر مورد توجه قرار گرفتهاند. نتایج نشاندهنده عدم وجود تعادل در پوشش مهارتهای فرآیند علمی در برنامه درسی آموزش علوم پایه ششم است؛ لذا بازنگری در برنامه درسی و توجه مؤلفان به موضوع توزیع متوازن مهارتها پیشنهاد میگردد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تحلیل محتوا؛ کتاب درسی؛ راهنمای معلم؛ علوم تجربی؛ مهارتهای فرایند علمی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Focusing the Science Textbook and Teacher's Guide of Sixth Grade and the Mastery of Teachers on Science Process Skills | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ehsan Alinia Bengar1؛ Mohammad Reza Nili Ahmadabadi2؛ Mahdi Vahedi3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Educational Management and Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In the contemporary century, applying science process skills is vital for lifelong learning. However, in our country, the situation of teaching skills and teachers' mastery over them is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the current situation of science process skills training and provide practical solutions to strengthen skills. At first, the twelve-skills coding scheme was compiled and the content of the science textbook of the sixth elementary grade, published in 2023-2024, and the related teacher's guide, published in 2013-2014, was analyzed with the Theme registration unit and Shannon's entropy method. Then, the researcher-made questionnaire containing 25 questions based on the Likert scale was distributed among 92 teachers of the sixth grade in Babolsar City, who were selected by the available sampling method. The content analysis tool and questionnaire were validated with input from educational technology professors, and the reliability of the content analysis was confirmed with kappa values between 0/627 and 0/871, and the questionnaire had a Cronbach's alpha of 0/82. The inferential statistics included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and paired t-test. According to the results, the most attention of textbook, teacher's guide, and teachers is on operational definition while communications and inference are relatively less. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Content Analysis, Textbook, Teacher's Guide, Science, Science Process Skills | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-Awidi, H., Abumosa, M., & Al-Mughrabi, A. (2024). The effect of mobile image recognition-based augmented reality application on students’ acquisition of science processing skills and motivations to learn science. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2367020
Haryanto, Maison, Suryani, A., Lumbantoruan, A., Dewi, U. P., Samosir, S. C., Sari, N., Putra, D. S., & Wiza, O. H. (2019). Science Process Skills: Basic and Integrated in Equilibrium Practicum. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8, 1421–1428.
Hecht, M., Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2019). Becoming a naturalist: Interest development across the learning ecology. Science Education, 103(3), 691-713.
Hung, S., & Wu, K. (2024). High school science teachers’ assessment literacy for inquiry-based science instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 46(7), 621–642.
Juniar, A., Silalahi, A., & Suyanti, R. D. (2021). The Effect of Teacher Candidates’ Science Process Skill on Analytical Chemistry Through Guided Inquiry Learning Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1), 012066.
Keles, N., & Nyaema, M. (2023). Comparison of the different types of visual representations integrated into the contents of the United States and Turkish middle school life science textbook units. Journal of Visual Literacy, 42(4), 229–245.
Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Social aspects of learning and knowledge building in a virtual community of teachers and students: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106550.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Research on Nature of Science and Science Education. In N. G. Lederman & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 25–48). Routledge.
McGrath, C. (2020). Conceptual models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 10(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v10n2p87
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2019). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (8th ed.). Pearson.
Mengistie, S., & Tadesse, M. (2023). Analysis of the Infusion of Science Process Skill Contents into the Ethiopian Grade Nine Biology Textbook: A Content Analysis. IPS Journal of Education, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.54117/ije.v1i1.7
Miller, R. L., & Brewer, C. A. (2019). A Handbook for the Study of Science. University of California Press.
National Academy of Sciences. (2019). Science, Evolution, and Creationism. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11876
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Sideri, A., & Skoumios, M. (2021). Science Process Skills in the Greek Primary School Science Textbooks. Science Education International, 32, 231–236.
Smith, J., & Williams, E. (2020). Reshaping science education through the emphasis on science process skills. Science Education Review, 37(1), 50–65.
Wang, Z., Yuan, R., & Wang, K. (2024). Unlocking the power of big ideas in education: a systematic review from 2010 to 2022. Research Papers in Education, 1–29.
Xue, S., Topping, K., Lakin, E., & Krell, M. (2024). Modelling Competence in Teacher Education: Comparing Meta-modelling Knowledge, Modelling Practices and Modelling Products Between Pre-service and In-service Teachers. Research in Science Education. 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10183-4
Yalçınkaya-Önder, E., ZorluoĞLu, S., TİMur, B., TİMur, S., GÜVenÇ, E., Özergun, I., & Özdemir, M. (2022). Investigation of Science Textbooks in terms of Science Process Skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9, 432–449.
Zhai, X., Xie, C., & Zang, Y. (2022). Research on the application of virtual simulation technology in the teaching of chemical reaction engineering. Frontiers in Education, 7, 637719.
Farasat, H., sayadi, M., & Yazdani Gachini, H. (2023). Analysis of the Contents of the Science Textbooks of the First Elementary Period, based on the Amount of Attention to Science Process Skills with Shannon Entropy Method. Educational and Scholastic studies, 12(1), 667–689. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.48310/pma.2023.2872
Harzkhani, H. Farnoosh, b. Fazli, F. Ansari, M. Soltani Mutlaq, M., & Abedini, M. (2019). Teacher's guide for experimental sciences of the fourth elementary school. Tehran: Offset. [In Persian]
jalili, R., Tanha, Z., & Ebrahimi, S. (2023). The Content Analysis of Second Elementary School Experimental Science Books in Iran with Respect to Personal Epistemology Components. Educational and Scholastic studies, 11(4), 549–572.
Kahrazahi, M., & Barahoei Moghadam, N. M. (2021). Investigating the content of experimental science textbooks in the second year of elementary school from the perspective of health and environmental components. Research in Biology Education, 3(1), 19–34. [In Persian]
Qarabeigi, L. Goshmardi, M., & Shairi, H. (2019). Educational skills in writing production and working memory performance in adults. French Language and Literature Research, 14(26), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.22034/rllfut.2019.8926
Rafiepour, A., & Esmaili, M. (2023). Effective Factors on the Math Performance of Eighth Grade Students in the TIMSS; A Comparative Study between Iran and Selected Countries. Educational and Scholastic studies, 11(4), 621–646. [In Persian]
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 303 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 18 |
||