پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 560 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,456 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,431,247 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,879,136 |
رابطه بین سبک‌های تفکر و رفتارهای تحصیلی خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان مقطع متوسطه شهر ناصریه در درس جغرافیا | ||
| پژوهش در آموزش مطالعات اجتماعی | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 81-110 اصل مقاله (809.02 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/rsse.2026.20952.1314 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سجاد سفیح ساجت الزاملی1؛ حمید رحیمی* 2 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران | ||
| 2گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| زمینه و هدف: در دنیای امروز، آموزش دیگر تنها به انتقال اطلاعات محدود نمی‌شود، بلکه پرورش مهارت‌های فکری و خلاقیت از اهداف اصلی نظام‌های آموزشی محسوب می‌شود. درس جغرافیا به عنوان یکی از دروس مهم و تحلیلی، بستری مناسب برای تقویت سبک‌های متنوع تفکر و بروز رفتارهای خلاقانه در دانش‌آموزان فراهم می‌آورد. از سوی دیگر، شناخت سبک‌های تفکر دانش‌آموزان می‌تواند معلمان را در انتخاب روش‌های تدریس مؤثر یاری دهد و زمینه رشد فردی و تحصیلی آنان را فراهم سازد. لذا پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین سبک‌های تفکر و رفتارهای تحصیلی خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان مقطع متوسطه در شهر ناصریه عراق در درس جغرافیا انجام شد. روش: نوع تحقیق، توصیفی-همبستگی و جامعه‌آماری شامل کلیه دانش‌آموزان مدارس دولتی است که درس جغرافیا را می‌گذرانند و حجم نمونه 360 نفر است که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند. پایایی پرسشنامه‌ها از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای سبک‌های تفکر (91/0) و رفتار تحصیلی خلاقانه (83/0) بدست آمد. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد سبک‌های تفکر و رفتارهای تحصیلی خلاقانه جمع‌آوری شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد در متغیر سبک‌های تفکر، بالاترین میانگین مربوط به سبک تفکر سلسله‌مراتبی و در متغیر رفتار خلاقانه، بالاترین میانگین مربوط به مولفه حل مساله بود. در سبک‌های تفکر قانونی، سلسله‌مراتبی، کل‌نگر، درونی و آزاداندیش، دانش‌آموزان دختر و در سبک‌های تفکر اجرایی، اولیگارشی، آنارشی، جزیی‌نگر و بیرونی، دانش‌آموزان پسر، میانگین بالاتری داشتند. همچنین بین سبک‌های تفکر و رفتارهای تحصیلی خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان (427/0=Beta) رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که رفتار تحصیلی خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان، متاثر از سبک‌های مختلف تفکر است. تأیید رابطه بین سبک‌های مختلف تفکر با رفتار خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان و شناسایی سبک و مهارتی که بیشترین ارتباط مثبت را با رفتار خلاقانه دانش‌آموزان دارد، به مسئولان و دست‌اندرکاران نظام آموزشی کمک می‌کند تا با توجه به قابل رشد بودن و پرورش سبک‌های مطلوب تفکر، زمینه‌های رشد رفتار خلاقانه را در دانش‌آموزان فراهم نمایند تا آنها بتوانند نقش خود را به عنوان فراگیرانی خلاق و نوآور در رشد و پیشرفت جامعه و موفقیت در زندگی ایفاء نمایند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سبک‌های تفکر؛ رفتار تحصیلی خلاقانه؛ دانش‌آموزان؛ مقطع متوسطه؛ جغرافیا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the relationship between thinking styles and creative academic behaviors of high school students in geography lessons in Nasiriyah city | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sajjad Safih Sajet Alzamali1؛ Hamid Rahimi2 | ||
| 1MA, Department of Education, School of Humanity, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Education, School of Humanity, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background And Objective: In today's world, education is no longer limited to the transmission of information, but the development of intellectual skills and creativity is considered one of the main goals of educational systems. Geography, as one of the important and analytical subjects, provides a suitable platform for strengthening diverse thinking styles and creative behaviors in students. On the other hand, understanding students' thinking styles can help teachers choose effective teaching methods and provide a basis for their personal and academic growth.. Method: the type of research was descriptive-correlational and the statistical population included all students in public schools who were studying geography. The sample size was 360 students, selected through a cluster random sampling method. Finding: The results showed that in the thinking styles variable, the highest average was related to the hierarchical thinking style and in the creative behavior variable, the highest average was related to the problem-solving component. Conclusion: The results of the study showed that students' creative academic behavior is affected by different thinking styles. Confirming the relationship between different thinking styles and students' creative behavior and identifying the style and skill that has the most positive relationship with students' creative behavior helps education system officials and stakeholders to provide opportunities for students to develop creative behavior. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Thinking Styles, Creative Academic Behavior, Secondary, School Students, Geography | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
-Acar, S., Tadik, H., Myers, D., Sman, C., & Uysal, R. (2020). Creativity and well‐being: A meta‐analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior. JOCB.485. doi: 10.1002/jocb.485. -Aljojo, N. (2017). Differences in styles of thinking ‘In Light of Sternberg's Theory': A case study of different educational levels in Saudi Arabia, Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7 (3): 333-346. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.291 -Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1962-04728-000 -An, Z., Ge, J., Xu, Y. (2023). Exploring the mediating effect of creativity on the relationship between family capital and academic achievement in geography. Sci Rep, 13, 21467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48833-8 -Ayasrah, S., Obeidat, M., Katatbeh, Q., Aljarrah, A., & Al-Akhras, M. A. (2023). Practicing creative thinking and its relation to academic achievement. Creativity Studies, 16(1), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.14661 -Barry, A., Haji, S., Shahabi, M. Sepahi, V., Ghasemi, M., Norouzi, A., & Ramezani, G. (2024). Assessment of the relationship between thinking styles and learning styles with academic performance in medical and nursing students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13(1):442. (In Persian). DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1301_23 -Barzegar, N., Ghourchian, N. & Taghipur, A. (2021). Providing a Model for the Creation of Innovation Capacities in Iran’s University Administration. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 14(1), 43-70. doi: 10.52547/MPES.14.1.43 -Cabra, J. F., & Uribe, D. (2013). Creative Behavior. In E. Carayannis, I. Dubina, N. Seel, D. F. J. Campbell, and D. Uzunidis’ (Eds.). Springer Encyclopedia on Creativity, Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. (pp. 267-271). New York, NY: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6 -Daymever, M. & Yousefi Roshan, M. R. (2020). Creating Effective Learning Contexts through Blended Learning and Field Trips in Geography Instruction. Quarterly Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 1(2), 69-95. 20.1001.1.27832279.1398.1.2.5.2 -Filgona, J., & Sababa, L. K. (2017). Effect of gender on senior secondary school students’ academic achievement in geography in ganye educational zone, Nigeria. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 3, 394–410. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.400596 -Ghanbari, S., Papi, M., & Derakhshanfard, S. (2020). Relationship between thinking styles and the academic achievement of occupational therapy students in Iran. J Educ Health Promot. 28; 9: 82. (In Persian). doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_545_19. -Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of Thinking, Abilities, and Academic Performance. Exceptional Children, 63(3), 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706300301 -Groza, M. D., Locander, D. A., & Howlett, C. H. (2016). Linking thinking styles to sales performance: The importance of creativity and subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4185–4193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.006 -Guilford, J. P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 -Hammad, M. A., & Awed, H. S. (2023). Thinking styles and their relationship with self-efficacy among deaf and hard-of-hearing adolescent students. Current Psychology, 42, 25880-25893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03597-8 -Han, J., Liu, N., & Wang, F. (2022). Graduate students’ perceived supervisor support and innovative behavior in research: The mediation effect of creative self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 875266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875266 -Harrison, A. F., & Bramson, R. M. (1982). Styles of thinking: Strategies for asking questions, making decisions, and solving problems. New York, NY: Actor Press.184-189. -Hasanuddin, H. (2021). Profile Students’ Thinking Style from Perspective Gender in Learning Activity. Jurnal Diversita, 7(2), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i2.5977 -Huang, Z., Yang, Y., & Dong, L. (2024). Fostering students’ geographical synthetic thinking using geographic subject mind maps. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 11, 788. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03312-x -Hubackova, S. (2015). Factors Influencing the Quality of Teaching and the Foreign Language Knowledge. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1952-1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.580 -Kadhim, A. S. & Mousa, H. Y. (2024). Formal Thinking Patterns (Monarchy-Hierarchy-Anarchy-Minority) and their Relationship to Academic Grit among Students at Al-Mustansiriyah University. Journal of Educational and Psychological Researches, 21(82), 379-413. https://jperc.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jperc/article/view/1870 -Kirmizi, F. S., Saygi, C., & Yurdakal, I. H. (2015). Determine the relationship between the disposition of critical thinking and the perception about problem solving skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 657661. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.719. -Ko, S. (2008). Do thinking styles of entrepreneurs matter in innovation. Journal of global business and technology. http://www. highbeam . com/doc/1p3-16 . 1020801 . html. -Li, J., Zhang, J., Bu, X., & Zhang, N. (2024). Does a creative person necessarily exhibit creativity? The interaction between creative personality and positions in social networks. Innovation, 26, 188–206. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2022.2105851 -Li- Fang, Z. (2006). Thinking Styles and big Five Personality traits revisited, Journal Elsevier Personality and Individual Difference. 40 (6): 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.011 -Lin, S., Duan, W., Wang, Y., & Duan, H. (2024). Thinking Style Moderates the Impact of the Classroom Environment on Language Creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 12(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12010005 -Liu, Z., Yu, H., Feng, M., & Hou, Y. (2023). Thinking Styles and Creativity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Adjustment in College Students. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100875 -Mahdavi, D. & Faramarezi, N. (2024). Analyzing the key and influential factors on geography education in secondary schools with a future research approach (case study: Karaj city secondary schools. Quarterly Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 6(1), 71-98. doi: 10.48310/rsse.2024.16527.1211 -Murphy, A., & Janeke, H. C. (2009). The relationship between thinking styles and emotional intelligence: an exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology. 39(3), 357-375. doi:10.1177/008124630903900310 -Najafi, M. R., & Rahimi, H. (2023). Predicting innovative academic behavior of students based on thinking skills, teamwork skills and problem-solving abilities. Research in Medical Education, 15(3), 39-50. (In Persian). URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1327-en.html -Paek, S.H., & Kim, M. (2024). Characteristics explaining students’ creative behaviors in South Korea using random forest. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09930-z -Patston, T. J., Kaufman, J. C., Cropley, A. J., & Marrone, R. (2021). What is creativity in education? A qualitative study of international curricula. J. Adv. Acad. 32, 207–230. -Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of Gender and Thinking Style on Student's Creative Thinking Ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5135-5139. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1087 -Rahman, K., Setapa, M., Ghazali, N. A., Sahari, N., & Ramli, N. H. (2022). Factors Affecting Innovative Behaviours among Students in Public Higher Learning in the Southern Region in Malaysia. Proceedings, 82(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082043 -Saini, G., Shabnam, Seema, & Bhatnagar, V. (2022). The Pattern of Executive Professionals’ Thinking Styles in Relation to cognitive Styles and Metacognition Skills. Cogent Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2022.2068741 -Sadeghzadeh Belil, N., Golshan, A. & Sadeghzadeh Belil, N. (2025). Evaluation of the Alignment of Geography Lessons in Second-Cycle Elementary Social Studies Textbooks with Environmental Education Standards. Quarterly Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, (In Press). Doi: 10.48310/rsse.2025.20178.1285 -Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2025). Creative self-efficacy, attitudes, creative style, and environmental literacy: Promoting mathematical creative thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2495329 -Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Societal forces that ERODE creativity. Teacher’s College Record, 120, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000505 -Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (2002). Defying the crowd: Simple solutions to the most common relationship problems. Simon and Schuster. -Strenberg, R. J, Wagner, R. K. (1997). Thinking style inventory (Unpublished test). New Haven, CT: Yale University. -Tang, C., Mao, S., Naumann, S. E., & Xing, Z. (2022). Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032 -Taylor, C. L. (2025). Gender Bias in Creativity: A Process Model for Understanding the Gender Gap in Creative Achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251360739 -Umami, R., Asfiah, N., Nurhasanah, S., Mu’ammal, I., & Ramadhina, A. S. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: Creative behavior using the Google Scholar database. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 7(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v7n1.2240 -Yang. C. S. & Lin, W. C. (2004). The Relationship among creative, critical Thinking and Thinking Style in Taiwan ltinght School Students. Journal of instructional Psychology, 31, 33-45. -Yayla, A., & Ilgin, V. E. (2023). Cultivating Innovative Behavior and Creative Thinking among Nursing Students: An Intervention Study. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 16(3), 1262-1270. https://avesis.atauni.edu.tr/yayin/770c4fe5-94d0-4578-a17a-b7b137678eb1/ -Zhang, W.X. (2003). Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(3), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025520116015 -Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2022). Paradoxical leadership, subjective ambivalence, and employee creativity: Effects of employee holistic thinking. Journal of Management Studies, 59(3), 695-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12792 -Zhu, C., & Zhang, L. (2011). Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 361–375. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 141 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 71 |
||