| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 556 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,410 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,320,285 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,814,893 |
تحلیل راهبردی نقش فناوریهای نوین در آموزش عالی | ||
| مطالعات بین رشته ای در آموزش | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 4، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 10، خرداد 1404، صفحه 99-116 اصل مقاله (1.5 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/ise.2025.18225.1212 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| لادن حاجیانوری* 1؛ عباس رمضانی2؛ سید وهاب امت محمدی3 | ||
| 1گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد رشته روابط عمومی گرایش صنعت و بازرگانی، گروه روابط عمومی، دانشکده علوم ارتباطات، دانشگاه علامهطباطبائی، | ||
| چکیده | ||
| زمینه و هدف: تلفیق فناوریهای نوین در آموزش عالی بهعنوان عاملی کلیدی در توسعۀ تفکر پیشروانۀ دانشجویان شناخته میشود. این پژوهش به تحلیل نقش این فناوریها در فرآیندهای آموزشی و با هدف توانمندسازی دانشجویان برای انطباق با تغییرات دنیای بیرون میپردازد. روش: این مطالعه از پارادایم تفسیری و رویکرد کیفی مبتنی بر ماتریس سوات بهره میبرد. دادهها از طریق مصاحبههای نیمهساختاریافته با 21 نفر از صاحبنظران حوزۀ آموزش عالی جمعآوری شد. نمونهگیری بهصورت هدفمند و گلولۀ برفی انجام شد و جمعآوری دادهها تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها با استفاده از تحلیل مضمون صورت گرفت. یافتهها: نتایج نشاندهندۀ نقاط قوتی چون یادگیری شخصیسازیشده، کلاسهای معکوس و روشهای نوآورانۀ ارزیابی بود. در مقابل، نقاط ضعفی نظیر حواسپرتی، خطرات امنیتی و چالشهای فنی شناسایی شدند. همچنین، فرصتهایی مانند خدمات پشتیبانی پیشرفته و تهدیداتی نظیر تغییرات سریع تکنولوژیکی نیز مورد اشاره قرار گرفتند. بحث و نتیجهگیری: برای بهرهبرداری بهینه از فناوریهای نوین، ضروری است که نقاط قوت و فرصتها تقویت شوند و نقاط ضعف و تهدیدات مدیریت گردند. این رویکرد میتواند به حداکثر کردن اثربخشی و کارایی فناوریها در آموزش عالی کمک کند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| آموزش عالی؛ تحلیل راهبردی؛ تهدیدات؛ فرصتها؛ فناوریهای نوین؛ ماتریس سوات؛ نقاط ضعف؛ نقاط قوت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Strategic Analysis of the Role of New Technologies in Higher Education | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ladan Hajianvari1؛ Abbas Ramezani2؛ Seyed Vahab Omat Mohammadi3 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Zanjan, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3M.A Student in Public Relations, Industry and Commerce major, Public Relations Department, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background and aim: The integration of emerging technologies into higher education is a key factor that significantly influences the development of progressive thinking among students in modern academic institutions. These technologies enhance students’ ability to perceive and adapt swiftly to the rapidly changing external environment. Accordingly, this study aims to strategically analyze the role of new technologies in higher education. Data and method: This applied research adopts an interpretive paradigm with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 21 subject-matter experts. Participants were selected using purposive snowball sampling, and interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis was employed to examine the interview transcripts and identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Findings: Key strengths identified include personalized learning, enhanced learning experiences, flipped classrooms, innovative assessment methods, and increased accessibility. Weaknesses encompassed distractions, security risks, variability in content quality, maintenance challenges, technical issues, and concerns over plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Opportunities observed in the study involved advanced student support systems, continuous feedback mechanisms, cloud computing, social learning, and international collaborations. Major threats included rapid technological advancements, educational disparities, resistance to change, and the potential for inefficient use of technology. Conclusion: In light of the findings, it is crucial to address the challenges strategically in order to maximize the benefits and opportunities of technology integration while minimizing its drawbacks. This approach will help ensure the effective and efficient application of new technologies in higher education. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Higher Education, Strategic Analysis, Threats, Opportunities, New Technologies, SWOT Matrix, Weaknesses, Strengths | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. E. J. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 Feng, B., Sun, K., Chen, M., & Gao, T. (2020). The impact of core technological capabilities of high-tech industry on sustainable competitive advantage. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072980 George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), Article 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196 Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 Huang, X., Li, H., Huang, L., & Jiang, T. (2023). Research on the development and innovation of online education based on digital knowledge sharing community. BMC Psychology, 11, Article 295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01337-6 Ifelebuegu, A., & Kulume, P. (2023). Chatbots and AI in education (AIEd) tools: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.2 Jang-Jaccard, J., & Nepal, S. (2014). A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(5), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005 Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834 Johnson-Clements, T., Curtis, G., & Clare, J. (2024). Testing a psychological model of post-pandemic academic cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09561-4 Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Knysh, I., Popovych, O., Zakharevych, M., Yakymenko, S., & Povlin, I. (2023). Innovative technologies drive the modernization of higher education. Amazonia Investiga, 12(70), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.70.10.15 Mansour, S., & Nogues, S. (2022). Advantages of and barriers to crafting new technology in healthcare organizations: A qualitative study in the COVID-19 context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), Article 9951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169951 Marshall, S., Blaj-Ward, L., Dreamson, N., Nyanjom, J., & Bertuol, M. T. (2024). The reshaping of higher education: Technological impacts, pedagogical change, and future projections. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2329393 Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348 Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856 Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1 Mumtaz, H., Riaz, M. H., Wajid, H., Saqib, M., Zeeshan, M. H., Khan, S. E., Chauhan, Y. R., Sohail, H., & Vohra, L. I. (2023). Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: A narrative review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, Article 1203945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1203945 Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S., & Reiners, T. (2019). Design of a SWOT analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystem contexts. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.283 Nikolic, S., Sandison, C., Haque, R., Daniel, S., Grundy, S., Belkina, M., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., & Neal, P. (2024). ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: An updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2372154 Onesi-Ozigagun, O., Ololade, Y. J., Eyo-Udo, N. L., & Ogundipe, D. O. (2024). Revolutionizing education through AI: A comprehensive review of enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1011 Pahl, N., & Richter, A. (2009). SWOT analysis: Idea, methodology and a practical approach. GRIN Verlag. Parveen, D., & Ramzan, S. (2024). The role of digital technologies in education: Benefits and challenges. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management, 2, 2029–2037. https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0299 Pickton, D. W., & Wright, S. (1998). What’s SWOT in strategic analysis? Strategic Change, 7(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1697(199803/04)7:2<101::AID-JSC332>3.0.CO;2-6 Poplavskyi, M. (2021). Innovative technologies in modern higher education: European experience and Ukrainian context. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, 25(esp. 3), 1698–1711. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.3.15586 Puyt, R. W., Lie, F. B., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). The origins of SWOT analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(1), Article 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304 Rafiq, S., Iqbal, S., & Afzal, A. (2024). The impact of digital tools and online learning platforms on higher education learning outcomes. Al-Mahdi Research Journal, 5(4), 359–369. Rezaei, A., Yasbolaghi Sharahi, B., & Khanjani Veshki, S. (2022). Model of educational technology to enhance students’ learning: Application of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational System, 15(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.48308/mpes.2022.102587 Santos, E. D. L., & Zanca, N. A. (2018). Transitioning to online: A SWOT analysis by first time online business faculty. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 12(3), 69–84. Saputra, R. (2022). SWOT analysis on implementing project management tool for digitalization of education management. Jurnal Pendidikan Multimedia, 4(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.17509/edsence.v4i2.52098 Selkrig, M., Dulfer, N., & Smith, C. (2024). Capturing the shifting work of teaching in higher education through postcards of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 542–568. Singh, N. (2023). Role of technological innovations in higher education. International Research Journal of Education and Technology, 5(1), 28–33. Tiwari, S. (2024). Digital transformation framework for higher education: Principles, guidelines, and actionable recommendations. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(9), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i9.2299 Vernice, M., Carretti, B., Sarti, D., Traficante, D., & Lorusso, M. L. (2021). Editorial: New educational technologies and their impact on students’ well-being and inclusion process. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 753471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753471 Wongvorachan, T., Lai, K. W., Bulut, O., Tsai, Y. S., & Chen, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence transforming the future of feedback in education. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 23(1), 1–22. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 427 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 312 |
||