| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 533 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,160 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,477,895 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,207,695 |
بررسی میزان نفوذ رویکرد استم در کتابهای درسی علوم تجربی دوره ابتدایی | ||
| پژوهش در آموزش شیمی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 29، فروردین 1405، صفحه 124-145 اصل مقاله (960.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/chemedu.2025.17949.1294 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه امیری* 1؛ محمدرضا گل صفتان2؛ فاطمه محمدپور1؛ مسلم امیری طیبی3 | ||
| 1گروه آموزش فیزیک، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889 –14665 تهران، ایران | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد مهندسی سیستمهای اقتصادی- اجتماعی، موسسه عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی | ||
| 3گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889 –14665 تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پیشینه و اهداف: رویکرد استم، به عنوان یک شیوه نوین بر آموزش همزمان علم، فنآوری، مهندسی و ریاضیات تاکید دارد. کاملترین نوع استم که آن را استم یکپارچه نامیدهاند، میکوشد چارچوبی برقرار کند که دانشآموزان حل مسائل جهان واقعی را با استفاده از علم، فناوری، مهندسی و ریاضیات تجربه کنند. اصلیترین نمود استم در کتابهای درسی ابتدایی میتواند در کتاب علوم تجربی باشد. علوم تجربی تنها کتابی است که شرایط رشد توانمندیهای علمی دانشآموزان را فراهم میکند و میتواند محملی برای پیادهسازی روش استم باشد. روشها: مقاله حاضر با روش تحلیل محتوا، به مطالعه تمامی سرفصلهای کتابهای علوم تجربی (نسخه 1403) شش پایه ابتدایی پرداخته است. در این پژوهش، با بر شماری نزدیک به 900 عنوان درسی، میزان نفوذ رویکرد استم در کتابهای مذکور بررسیشده است. میزان توجه کتابهای علوم تجربی به حوزههای چهارگانه استم بعلاوه هنر و اجتماعی به صورت جداگانه و نیز به صورت استم یکپارچه در این مقاله مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. یافتهها: نتایج این بررسی نشان میدهد که هرچند شکل کامل و مطلوب استم یکپارچه در کتابهای علوم تجربی پیادهسازی نشده است؛ با این وجود، سرفصلهای کتابهای علوم تجربی؛ نگاهی به حوزههای استم، به ویژه حوزه مهندسی دارند. نتیجهگیری: این نگاه، هرچند میتواند نقطه روشنی برای ابتدای کار باشد، اما از نگاه رویکرد استم یکپارچه، هنوز راه زیادی برای توسعه و تعالی وجود دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| رویکرد استم؛ استم یکپارچه؛ استیمس؛ برنامه درسی؛ کتاب علومتجربی؛ تحلیل محتوا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Influence of the STEM approach in elementary science textbooks | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Amiri1؛ Mohammad Reza Golsefatan2؛ Fatemeh Mohammadpour1؛ Moslem Amiri tayyebi3 | ||
| 1Department of Physics Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Master of Science in Socio-Economic Systems Engineering, Higher Institute of Management and Planning Education and Research | ||
| 3Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background and Objective: The STEM approach, as a new method, emphasizes the simultaneous teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The most complete type of STEM, called integrated STEM, attempts to establish a framework in which students experience solving real-world problems using science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The main manifestation of STEM in elementary school textbooks can be seen in science textbooks. Science is the only book that provides the conditions for the growth of students’ scientific capabilities and can be a vehicle for implementing the STEM method. Materials and Methods: Using the content analysis method, the present article studied all the headings of the science textbooks for the six elementary-level school grades. In this study, the extent of the influence of the STEM approach in the aforementioned books including nearly 900 course titles was examined. The extent to which science textbooks focus on the four STEM areas, as well as art and social studies, separately and as an integrated STEM is examined in this article. Findings: The results of this study show that although the complete and desirable form of integrated STEM has not been implemented in empirical science textbooks, the headings of empirical science textbooks do have a look at STEM fields, especially engineering. Conclusion: Although this look can be a bright spot at the outset, from the perspective of the integrated STEM approach, there is still a long way to go toward development and excellence. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| STEM Approach, integrated STEM curriculum, science textbook, content analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, E. (2023). Investigating the importance of the STEM approach in education. In Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran, Tehran, Iran. Amini, K., Ghanbari, M., & Beheshtian, J. (2021). Designing educational content on entropy with the STEM approach and concept map. Research in Chemistry Education, 3(4), 1–27. Amiri, F., & Golseftan, M. R. (2019). STEM approach and its implementation requirements in Iran. Journal of Education in Basic Sciences, 5(16), 48–50. Asghari Asl Sardrood, M., Maleki Avarsin, S., Baghayi, H., & Yari Haj Atalou, J. (2022). Characteristics of the elements of the science education curriculum based on the STEAM method. Journal of Educational Innovations, 21(4), 105–132. Bahrami Maddah, A. M., Fathinia, M., Haghighat, H., & Serkan, Z. (2023). Designing educational content for the subject of electrochemistry by combining STEM and TPACK approaches. Research in Chemistry Education, 4(3), 1–28. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. Cheng, M. F., Lo, Y. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2024). The impact of STEM curriculum on students’ engineering design abilities and attitudes toward STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34, 1–29. Dalvi, T. S. (2018). Engineering in elementary STEM education: Curriculum design, instruction, learning, and assessment (Book review of Christine M. Cunningham). Teachers College Press. Davoudi, S. T., Davoudi, T., Davoudi, R., & Davoudi, S. M. (2023). STEM strategy: A novel approach to effective education. In Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Management and Humanities Science Research in Iran, Tehran, Iran. DeCoito, I. (2024). STEM education: Curriculum and pedagogy. In Global perspectives on STEM education: Theory and practice (pp. 51–72). Springer. Forbes, A., Chandra, V., Pfeiffer, L., & Sheffield, R. (2021). STEM education in the primary school: A teacher’s toolkit. Cambridge University Press. Ghalkhani, M., & Esmaeili, K. (2021). Designing educational content for corrosion based on the STEM approach for undergraduate chemistry students. Research in Chemistry Education, 3(4), 45–70. Kadkhoda, A. M., Ahmadi, F., Hamidi, F., & Nowroozi Larki, F. (2023). Effects of the STEM approach on students’ problem-solving skill in science education. Quarterly of Iranian Distance Education Journal, 5(1), 144–154. Karimzadeh, E., Ayati, M., & Pourshafei, H. (2022). Implementation problems of integrated STEM education: A systematic review. Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 1(1), 85–102. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 1–11. Kennedy, T. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2022). Introduction: The role of play and STEM in the early years. In Play and STEM education in the early years: International policies and practices (pp. 3–37). Springer. Li, Y., & Anderson, J. (2020). STEM integration: Diverse approaches to meet diverse needs. In Integrated approaches to STEM education: An international perspective (pp. 15–20). Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–16. Mirrahimi, M. S., & Ahmadi, P. (2022). Investigation and analysis of the status of the transdisciplinary STEM approach in the school curriculum. Journal of Educational Research, 10(44), 47–55. Moomaw, S. (2024). Teaching STEM in the early years: Activities for integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Redleaf Press. Murphy, C., Venkat, H., Leahy, M., Broderick, N., Kelly, O., Butler, D., Harbison, L., Lawlor, C., & Naughton, Y. (2023). STEM education: Curriculum and literature overview & primary science education: Systematic literature review. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. Portillo-Blanco, A., Deprez, H., De Cock, M., Guisasola, J., & Zuza, K. (2024). A systematic literature review of integrated STEM education: Uncovering consensus and diversity in principles and characteristics. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1028. Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1–21. Sanders, M. E. (2008). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26. Suhirman, S., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Overcoming challenges in STEM education: A literature review that leads to effective pedagogy in STEM learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 432–443. Zolfaghari, P., Ebrahimi Dabbagh, M., & Aryanfar, M. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of teaching physics topics using the STEM method on tenth-grade experimental science students in Neishabour City. Journal of Education in Basic Sciences, 8(27), 18–27. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 371 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 330 |
||