پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 556 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,410 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,317,535 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,814,224 |
چالش‌های کارورزی فکورانه از نگاه دانشجو-معلمان گروه علوم پایه دانشگاه فرهنگیان تهران | ||
| آموزش پژوهی نوین | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 45، خرداد 1405، صفحه 95-110 اصل مقاله (445.95 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عظیمه تکریمی1؛ شریف کامیابی* 2 | ||
| 1گروه آموزشی علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2. گروه آموزشی علوم پایه، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی889-14665، تهران، ایران، | ||
| چکیده | ||
| دانشگاه فرهنگیان، همواره تأکید ویژه‌ای بر ترویج کارورزی فکورانه و کمک به دانشجو معلمان در شناخت، اصلاح و ارتقای هویت حرفه‌ای خود داشته است. هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی مشکلات عملی در اجرای برنامه کارورزی است. این پژوهش، به بررسی ضرورت اجرای صحیح کارورزی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان، همچنین چالش‌های موجود در اجرای کارورزی از دید کارورزان می‌پردازد. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی از نوع تحلیل محتوای قراردادی انجام شد. نمونه‌گیری از نوع هدفمند بود و تا اشباع کامل داده‌ها از 24 نفر از دانشجویان که به‌طور میانگین 4 واحد کارورزی گذرانده بودند، برای اعتباربخشی یافته‌ها از دو روش بررسی توسط مشارکت‌کنندگان و بررسی توسط همکاران استفاده شد. یافته‌های حاصل از تحلیل مصاحبه‌ها نشان داد که این درس با چالش‌های زیر روبرو است، نقش استادان راهنما، نقش معلمان راهنما ، ویژگی‌های تحصیلی، شناختی و انگیزشی کارورزان، فضای فیزیکی، اجتماعی، عاطفی مدرسه و عدم‌حمایت و برنامه‌ریزی دانشگاه مهم‌ترین عوامل چالش‌های کارورزی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان هستند. بر مبنای تجربیات دانشجویان کارورز، برنامه‌ریزی اجرایی دانشگاه فرهنگیان برای تبیین اهمیت و ابعاد کارورزی فکورانه به نحو کافی انجام نشده است. این موضوع باعث دلسردی کارورزان و کاهش کارآمدی کارورزی، به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین برنامه تربیت‌معلم، شده است. برای حل این مشکل، بهره گیری از نتایج پژوهش‌های انجام شده از قبیل سبک‌ها و طرح‌های نوین عملیاتی کارورزی، ایجاد سازوکار مناسب برای تعامل با مدارس، توانمندسازی عوامل مشارکت‌کننده در کارورزی، افزایش سطح علمی و عملیاتی مدراس، افزایش نظارت و پایش مداوم کارورزی می‌تواند در رفع چالش‌ها مؤثر باشد. | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Challenges in Implementing Reflective Internship at at Farhangian University: A Qualitative Study | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Azimeh Takrimi1؛ Sharif Kaamyabi2 | ||
| 1Department of Humanities, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Basic Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 889-14665, Tehran, Iran, | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Extended Abstract Challenges in Implementing Reflective Internship at at Farhangian University: A Qualitative Study Introduction: Internship is a central component of teacher education at Farhangian University, providing student-teachers with opportunities to connect theoretical knowledge with classroom practice and develop professional competencies. The university’s internship program, implemented since 2014, accounts for more than 12% of the teacher education curriculum. It is grounded in competency-based, educational, integrated, flexible, and practice-oriented principles. Although previous studies have examined the importance and general effectiveness of internship, less attention has been given to student-teachers’ perceptions of the challenges involved in its implementation. Accordingly, this study explored student-teachers’ perceptions of the challenges of implementing reflective internship at Farhangian University. Methods and Data: This qualitative study used conventional content analysis. Participants were 24 student-teachers in the basic sciences at Farhangian University campuses in Tehran. They were selected purposively and had completed at least two of the four internship courses, with a minimum of one year of internship experience. Sampling continued until data saturation was reached. Participants represented physics education (5), mathematics education (6), chemistry education (6), and biology education (7). Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews about participants’ experiences of the four internship courses. The interviews included guiding questions and follow-up questions based on participants’ responses. To strengthen the credibility of the findings, five participants reviewed the researchers’ interpretations of their accounts, and two experienced colleagues reviewed the analyzed findings. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the data were coded and organized using MAXQDA 2020. Findings: The analysis identified five broad categories of implementation challenges. The first concerned university supervisors, including limited awareness of the importance of internship, inappropriate assessment, insufficient communication with student-teachers and mentor teachers, and inadequate guidance and supervision. The second category involved mentor teachers, who were sometimes insufficiently familiar with the internship program, distrustful of interns, or inattentive to their needs and difficulties. The third category concerned student-teachers’ experiences. These included an incomplete understanding of reflective internship, unmet expectations, and the perception that internship activities and their associated reports and forms were merely formal requirements. The fourth category related to the school environment, including top-down interactions by school administrators and staff, inadequate classroom or office space, and the absence of a structured internship guidance program. The fifth category involved university planning and support, including inadequate monitoring, changing or inconsistent guidelines, insufficient time, and weaknesses in selecting and preparing qualified mentor teachers. Discussion and Conclusion: The findings point to challenges across several interconnected levels: the university, the school, and the individuals involved in the internship. Gaps in communication, preparation, guidance, and coordination appear to undermine the intended reflective and practice-based purpose of the program. In particular, when participants do not receive consistent guidance and support, internship tasks and documentation may be experienced as procedural requirements rather than opportunities for professional learning. The findings therefore suggest that the effectiveness of reflective internship depends not only on its curriculum, but also on how clearly its aims are communicated and how consistently its stakeholders are prepared and supported. The study concludes that the current implementation and planning of reflective internship at Farhangian University do not adequately communicate its importance and dimensions to student-teachers and other stakeholders. This may contribute to student-teachers’ discouragement and reduce the program’s effectiveness. The study recommends adopting updated internship models, establishing formal mechanisms for collaboration between the university and schools, strengthening the preparation and capacities of those involved, and conducting continuous monitoring of implementation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| reflective internship, internship challenges, student-teachers, Farhangian University | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi, H. (2009). Analysis of the implementation status of the management internship program in educational organizations. Journal of Education, 101, 86–110.
Ahmadi, A. (2015). Practical guide to the internship program of Farhangian University with a reflective teacher approach (1st ed.). Farhangian University Press.
Ahmadi, A., & Elhamian, N. (2020). Examining the internship curriculum with a reflective teacher approach from the perspective of Farhangian University professors. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 9–37.
Almasi, H., Zarei Zavareki, E., Nili, M. R., & Delavar, A. (2017). Evaluation of the fourth internship curriculum at Farhangian University based on Tyler’s objective-oriented evaluation model. Teaching Research, 5(1), 1–24.
Farhangian University Internship Program Practical Guide with a Reflective Teacher Approach. (2015). (Prepared by a group of authors). Farhangian University Press.
Hosseinzadeh, F., Saheb Zamani, M., Niknami, M., & Mohammad Davoudi, A. H. (2021). Identifying dimensions and components of the effectiveness of Farhangian University internship courses. Lifestyle and Health Quarterly, 5(2), 254–264.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Irannezhad, M., Mousapour, N., Safarnavadeh, M., Azhari, M., & Mohammad Shafiee, A. (2020). Lived experience of professors of the new teacher education internship program in Iran. Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 8(15), 5–34.
Jafarian, V., & Mahmoudi, F. (2021). Student-teachers’ experiences of the new internship scheme at Farhangian University, Tabriz: A phenomenological study. Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 13(6), 561–570.
Jamshidi Tavana, A., & Imam Jomeh, M. (2016). Investigating the impact of reflective internship in teacher education curriculum on the development of student-teachers’ competencies. Curriculum Research, 26(2), 67–77.
Jamshidi Tavana, A., Imam Jomeh, M., Osareh, A., & Mousapour, N. (2017). Analyzing the experiences of Tehran Farhangian University student-teachers from the internship course. Research in Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 1–20.
Kamyabi, S., & Samiei, D. M. (2021). Identifying the components of technological knowledge needed by novice teachers for application in the teaching process. Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, 8(14), 21–42.
Khoroshi, P. (2020). Constructivist approach and Farhangian University internship curriculum. Scientific Quarterly of Internship Studies in Teacher Education, 2(2), 1–23.
Khoroshi, P., Parishani, N., & Ghorbani, S. (2020). Investigating problems and issues of the internship course from the perspective of Farhangian University lecturers (Case study: Farhangian University, Isfahan). Research in Teacher Education, 3(1), 13–39.
Paredes, C. S., Aguaded Ramírez, E. M., & Rodríguez-Sabiote, C. (2021). Content validation of a semi-structured interview to analyze the management of suffering. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111393
Rajaei Topkanloo, A., & Mahmoudi, M. (2021). Identifying and analyzing factors affecting the success of the internship course in empowering student-teachers. Inquiry in Educational Psychology and Counseling, 7(14).
Safarnavadeh, M., Mousapour, N., Azhari, M., & Mohammad Shafiee, A. (2019). Lived experience of Farhangian University student-teachers from the new teacher education internship program in Iran. Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 10(19), 149–169.
Sheikh-Islami, A., Sadri Damirchi, E., & Mohammadi, F. (2023). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom method on students’ tendency towards critical thinking. Research in Educational Systems, 17(61), 22–32.
Toshtemirovich, R. Z. (2024). The importance of developing students’ academic competence in the process of modern higher education. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 5(4), 43–50.
Zare Sefat, S. (2017). Analyzing the lived experiences of internship at Farhangian University: A conceptual model. Theory and Practice in Curriculum, 5(9), 37–68.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 527 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 307 |
||