تعداد نشریات | 24 |
تعداد شمارهها | 427 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,280 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,645,650 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,972,727 |
طراحی مدل حمایت حرفهای از نومعلمان: یک مطالعة ترکیبی | ||
مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی | ||
دوره 11، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 32، آبان 1401، صفحه 510-479 اصل مقاله (1.76 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
نویسندگان | ||
احسان زارعی1؛ حسین زینلی پور* 2؛ نعمت الله موسی پور3؛ عبدالوهاب سماوی4 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری برنامهریزی درسی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، هرمزگان، ایران | ||
2دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکدة علوم انسانی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران | ||
3استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکدة علوم انسانی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران | ||
4دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکدة علوم انسانی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 04 بهمن 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 آذر 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 اردیبهشت 1400 | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی روش های حمایت حرفه ای از نومعلمان در سطح جهانی بود. در این پژوهش، از روش تحلیل مضمون، سبک آتراید-استرلینگ، به منظور تحلیل مضامین برآمده از مقالات انگلیسی مرتبط با حمایت حرفهای از «دورة آغازین خدمت» نومعلمان، استفاده شده است. ابتدا با استفاده از الگوی مرور نظام دار متون، پژوهشها در بازة سال های 2010-2020 از سه پایگاه اطلاعاتی Springer، Taylor & Francis Groupو sciencedirect انتخاب، پالایش و سپس با استفاده از نرمافزار MAXQDA در قالب 3 مضمون فراگیر، 14مضمون سازماندهنده و 58 مضمون پایه، تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان میدهد حمایت حرفهای از نومعلمان طی «دورة آغازین خدمت» شامل سه مؤلفة «حمایت سازمانی (اداری)»، «منتورینگ» و «حمایت مدرسه ای» است که مکمل یکدیگر هستند. برنامه های حمایت از دورة آغازین خدمت، سبب ماندگاری و کارآمدی بیشتر نومعلمان بوده است. بر این اساس، پیشنهاد می شود آموزش و پرورش ایران از این تجربة جهانی برای تدوین و اجرای یک «برنامة درسی بومی حمایت حرفه ای از دورة آغازین خدمت معلمی» استفاده و اجرا کند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
حمایت حرفه ای؛ منتورینگ؛ نومعلم | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Modelling the Induction for New Teachers: The Mixed Method Study | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
ehsan zarei1؛ Hosain zainalipour2؛ Nematollah Mousapour3؛ wahab samavi4 | ||
1Ph.D. Student in Curriculum, Hormozgan University, Hormozgan, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran | ||
3Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran | ||
4Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The aim of the current research is to identify the methods of induction for new teachers at the global level. In this research, the theme analysis method, Atride-Sterling style, has been used to analyze the themes emerging from English articles related to induction of the "initial service period" of new teachers. First, using the systematic text review model, researches in the period of 2010-2020 from three databases Springer, Taylor&Francis Group and sciencedirect were selected, refined and then using MAXQDA software in the form of 3 overarching themes, 14 organizing themes and 58 The basic theme was analyzed. The results show that induction for new teachers during the "initial period of service" includes three components: "organizational (administrative) support", "mentoring" and "school support" which complement each other. induction programs for the initial period of service have made new teachers more durable and efficient. Based on this, it is suggested that the education of Iran use this global experience to develop and implement a "native curriculum of induction for the initial period of teaching service". | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Induction, Mentoring, New teacher | ||
مراجع | ||
Able, H., Glazier, J., Mallous, R., Boyd. A., Bell-Hughes, K., & Eaker-Rich, D. (2018). Reconnect and recharge: Plugging new teachers into support outlets. Action in Teacher Education, 40(2), 203-219. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. Bastian, K. C., & Marks, J. T. (2017). Connecting teacher preparation to teacher induction: Outcomes for beginning teachers in a university-based support program in low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 360–394. Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2015). Exploring mechanisms of effective teacher coaching: A tale of two cohorts from a randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 542–566. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Journals, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Buysse, V., & Hollingsworth, H. L. (2009). Program quality and early childhood inclusion: Recommendations for professional development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 119–128. Carter, M., & Francis, R. (2001). Mentoring and beginning teachers’workplace learning. Teacher Education, 29(3), 249–262. Craig, C. J. (2017). International teacher attrition: Multiperspective views [Special issue]. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(8), 859-862. Davis, B., & Higdon, K. (2008). The effects of mentoring/induction support on beginning teachers’ practices in early elementary classrooms (K-3). Research in Childhood Education, 22(3), 261–274. De Jong, D., & Campoli, A. (2018). Curricular coaches’ impact on retention for early-career elementary teachers in the USA: Implications for urban schools. Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(2), 191–200. Du, F., & Wang, Q. (2017). New teachers’ perspectives of informal mentoring: quality of mentoring and contributors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(3), 309-328. Ehsanipour, T., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2017). Exploring coaching for powerful technology use in education. Center to Support Excellence in Teaching – Stanford University. Digital Promise. Accessed 1 September 2017. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. European Commission (2010). Developing coherent and system-wide induction programmes for beginning teachers: A handbook for policymakers. Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: The role of an exemplary support teacher. Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30. Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., & Yusko, B. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching. Fletcher, S., Strong, M., & Villar, A. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110(10), 2271–2289. Fresko, B., & Alhija, F. N. (2015). Induction seminars as professional learning communities for beginning teachers. Teacher Education, 43(1), 36-48. Ganser, T. (2002). The new teacher mentors: Four trends that are changing the look of mentoring programs for new teachers. American School Board Journal, 189(12), 25–27. Gardiner, W. (2011). New urban teachers experience induction coaching: “Moving vision toward reality”. Action in Teacher Education, 33(4), 359-373. Gardiner, W. (2017). Mentoring “Inside” and “Outside” the action of teaching: a professional framework for mentoring. The New Educator, 13(1), 53-71. Gardiner, W., & Weisling, N. (2016). Mentoring ‘inside’ the action of teaching: Induction coaches’ perspectives and practices. Professional Development in Education, 42(5), 671-686. Glassford, L. A., & Salinitri, G. (2007). Designing a successful new teacher induction program: An assessment of the Ontario Experience 2003–2006. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 60, 1–34. Hebert, E., & Worthy, T. (2001). Does the first year of teaching have to be a bad one?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 897–911. Heikkinen, H. L. T., Wilkinson, J., Aspfors, J., & Bristol, L. (2018). Understanding mentoring of new teachers: Communicative and strategic practices in Australia and Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 1–11. Heredia, S. C., & Yu, J. H. (2017). Matter of choice: Opportunities for informal science institutions to support science teacher induction. Science Teacher Education, 28(6), 549-565. Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2006). The design of an online community of practice for beginning teacher. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 120–132. Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 287–297. Hudson, P. (2013). Mentoring as professional development: Growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 771–783. Ibrahim, A. S. (2012). Induction and mentoring of novice teachers: A scheme for the United Arab Emirates. Teacher Development, 16(2), 235-253. Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter?. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. Kane, R. G., & Francis, A. (2013). Preparing teachers for professional learning: Is there a future for teacher education in new teacher induction?. Teacher Development, 17(3), 362-379. Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrativebiographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 105–120. Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L.T., Fransson, G., & Aspfors, J. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154-164. Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. Kyndt, E., Govaerts, N., Verbeek, E., & Dochy, F. (2014). Development and validation of a questionnaire on informal workplace learning outcomes: A study among socioeducational care workers. Social Work, 44, 2391–2410. Lu, X., Kaiser, G., & Leung, F. K. S. (2019). Mentoring early career mathematics teachers from the mentees_ perspective—a case study from China. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1355–1374. Mansfield, C., & Gu, Q. (2019). I’m finally getting that help that I needed”: Early career teacher induction and professional learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46, 639–659. Martin, K. L., Buelow, S. M., & Hoffman, J. T. (2016). New teacher induction: Support that impacts beginning middle-level educators. Middle School Journal, 47(1), 4-12. Marz, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2020). The networking teacher in action: A qualitative analysis of early career teachers' induction process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87(1), 1-15. Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 47–59. Meyer, T. (2002). Novice teacher learning communities: An alternative to one-on-one mentoring. American Secondary Education, 31(1), 27–42. Mitchell, D. E., Kwok, A., & Huston, D. (2019). Induction program structures as mediating factors for coach influence on novice teacher development. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 812-832. Moore, A. )2016(. Stepping up support for new teachers. Educational leadership, 73(8), 60–64. Moskowitz, J., & Stephens, M. (1997). From students of teaching to teachers of students: Teacher induction around the Pacific Rim. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Nolan, A. (2017). Effective mentoring for the next generation of early childhood teachers in Victoria, Australia. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(3), 272-290. Norman, P. J., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2005). Mind activity in teaching and mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 679–697. Olsher, G., & Kantor, I. D. (2012). Asking questions as a key strategy in guiding a novice teacher: A self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 8(2), 157-168. Olson, M., & Osborne, J. (1991). Learning to teach: The first year. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(4), 331–43. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Supporting teacher professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2013. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing. Pennanen, M., Bristol, L., Wilkinson, J., & Heikkinen, H. L. T. (2016). What is ‘good’ mentoring? Understanding mentoring practices of teacher induction through case studies of Finland and Australia. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 27-53. Ronfeldt, M., & McQueen, K. (2017). Does new teacher induction really improve retention?. Education, 68 (4), 394–410. Schmidt, M., & Knowles, J. (1995). Four women’s stories of failure as beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 429–44. Schwille, S. A. (2008). The professional practice of mentoring. American Journal of Education, 115, 139–167. Sela, O., & Harel. M. (2019). You have to prove yourself, initiate projects, be active’: the role of novice teachers in their own induction process. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 190-204. Smith, E. R. (2011). Faculty mentors in teacher induction: Developing a cross-institutional identity. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 316–319. Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714. Sowell, M. (2017). Effective practices for mentoring beginning middle school teachers: Mentor's perspectives. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(4), 129-134. Thomas, L., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2019). Beginning teachers’ professional support: A mixed methods social network study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 134-147. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178. Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481–546. Wayne, A., Young, P., & Fleischman, S. (2005). Improving teacher induction. Educational Leadership, 62(8), 76–78. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX. National Staff Development Council. Wilkins, E. A., & Okrasinski, J. E. (2015). Induction and mentoring: Levels of student teacher understanding. Action in Teacher Education, 37(3), 299–313. Wong, H. K. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 88(638), 41–58. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 282 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 586 |