| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 515 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,033 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,264,629 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,056,732 |
شناسایی ابعاد بالندگی پژوهشی اعضاء هیئتعلمی تربیت معلم در سایه پژوهش معلم محور با تبیین وضعیت موجود به روش آمیخته اکتشافی | ||
| مطالعات سیاست گذاری تربیت معلم | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 7، شماره 1، خرداد 1404، صفحه 79-102 اصل مقاله (1.34 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/edup.2025.19808.1430 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی اکبر سادین* 1؛ سجاد جلیلیان2 | ||
| 1دکتری مدیریت آموزشی و مدرس دانشگاه فرهنگیان - کرج- ایران | ||
| 2دانش آموخته مطالعات سیاسی انقلاب اسلامی، (مدرس دانشگاه فرهنگیان) گرایش آینده پژوهی دانشگاه شاهد | ||
| چکیده | ||
| معلمان دارای بینش پژوهشی نسبت به تولید اندیشه اهتمام ورزیده و بیش از دیگران در کنشهای کلاسی از آن بهرهمند میشوند.از اهداف برنامه درسی در تربیتمعلم، پدیداری معلمانی با چنین ویژگی است.مسلماً ظهور معلم پژوهنده در تربیتمعلم مستلزم هیئتعلمی برخوردار از خرد پژوهشی میباشد بر این اساس در این مطالعه ابعاد بالندگی پژوهشی اعضاء هیئتعلمی بر مبنای پژوهشهای معلممحور در تربیتمعلم شناسایی و تبیین گردید. سپهر فلسفی حاکم بر پژوهش متکی بر رویکرد پراگماتیسم با روش آمیخته اکتشافی بود و از حیث جهتگیری مبتنی بر رویکرد دادهبنیاد با زمانبندی توالی و وزندهی بیشتر به دادههایکیفی انجامشد.اساس جمعآوریدادهها در بخشکیفی مصاحبههای نیمهسازمانیافته با خبرگان مطلع بود که با روشهای تئوریک، فرصتطلبانه و گروههایکانونی انتخاب و به روش کدگذاری باز و محوری تجزیهوتحلیل شد.برای حصولروایی، شاخصهای نسبترواییمحتواییCVR (6/44) و CVI (8/88) تاییدشد و با رویکرد سهسوسازی عمل تطبیق انجام شد که منجر به اصلاح 7 و حذف2 نشانگرگردید.برای پایایی آلفایکرونباخ(801/0) و بازآزمایی(871/0) محاسبه و تایید گردید. درنهایت 52نشانگر17مؤلفه و6بعد وارد مرحلهکمی شدند. در بخشکمی روشهایخوشهای و سرشماری از اعضاءهیئتعلمی(187)و دانشجویان(220) ملاک نمونهگیری بود. دراینبخش اعتباریابیمدل با تحلیل عاملی تاییدی با رویکردpls در مرتبه اول اندازهگیریانعکاسی و در مرتبه دوم و سوم ترکیبی برازش گردید. برای تبیین وضعیتموجود نیز از آزمونt تکنمونهای بهوسیله spss24 استفاده گردید که نتایج حاکی از تایید 9 فرض صفر و رد 8 فرض صفر بود. بعد از تجزیهوتحلیل در بخشکمی مهارتهایعمومی، کنشپژوهی، درسپژوهی، آیندهپژوهی، اقدامپژوهی و روایتپژوهی، بههمراه نشانگرهایی متناسب با بافت و زمینه تربیتمعلم به عنوان ابعاداصلی شناساییگردید که نتایج گواهی بر کمجانی پژوهش در بیناعضاء بود | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بالندگیپژوهشی؛ پژوهش معلممحور؛ کنشپژوهی؛ درسپژوهی؛ آیندهپژوهی؛ اقدامپژوهی و روایتپژوهی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying the dimensions of research excellence of teacher education faculty members in the shadow of teacher-centered research by explaining the current situation in a mixed exploratory method | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ali akbar sadin1؛ sajjad jalilian2 | ||
| 1PhD in Educational Management and Lecturer at Farhangian University - Karaj - Iran | ||
| 2Graduated in Political Studies of the Islamic Revolution, (Teacher at Farhangian University), Future Studies major, Shahed University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Research-oriented teachers are dedicated to producing ideas and benefit more than others from classroom interactions.One of the goals of teacher education programs is to develop teachers with such characteristics. The emergence of research-oriented teachers in teacher training requires a faculty with research wisdom. This study identifies and explains the dimensions of the research growth of faculty members based on teacher-centered research in teacher education.The philosophical framework of the research is based on a pragmatic approach,employing a mixed exploratory method. The qualitative data collection relied on semi-structured interviews with knowledgeable experts, analyzed through open and axial coding. To ensure validity, content validity ratios (CVR: 0.44) and content validity indices (CVI: 0.88) were confirmed. A three-way adjustment approach led to the revision of 7 indicators and the removal of 2. Reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's alpha (0.801) and retest (0.871). Ultimately, 52 indicators across 17 components and 6 dimensions entered the quantitative phase.The quantitative section utilized cluster sampling from faculty members (187) and students (220). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the model, revealing 9 null hypotheses confirmed and 8 rejected. The analysis highlighted general skills, action research, lesson research, and narrative research as main dimensions, indicating a lack of research vitality among members. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Research growth, teacher-centered research, lesson research, future studies, action research, and narrative research | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Fivush, R., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., McAdams, D. P. & Syed, M. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 519-527. Baasandorj, D. (2010). Faculty Development Program Needs at Mongolian State Universities: Content and Strategies. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. (in Persian). Balash, F. (2015). Enhancement of Junior Academics Professionalism Through Research and Development Activities in an Iranian Medical University Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Beach, j sorcinelli, s.j (2016). New K–12 science education standards may face implementation challenges. Eos, 94(18), 166–167. Belotto, M. J. (2018). Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis. Qualitative Report, 23(11). Berry, S. (2019). Professional development for online faculty: instructors’ perspectives on cultivating technical, pedagogical and content knowledge in a distance program. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1), 121-136. Bilbao, N., Garay, U., Romero, A., & López de la Serna, A. (2021). The European Competency and the Teaching for Understanding Frameworks: Creating Synergies in the Context of Initial Teacher Training in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13(4), 1810. Bond, M. A., & Blevins, S. J. (2020). Using faculty professional development to foster organizational change: A social learning framework. TechTrends, 64(2), 229-237. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. Sage. Buchanan, J. (2018). Changing schools: Undertaking action research. Supporting professional learning in Southeast Asian universities through DEPISA. Monograph, (5), 15-22. Chenuil, A., Cahill, A. E., Délémontey, N., Du Luc, E. D. S., & Fanton, H. (2019). Problems and questions posed by cryptic species. A framework to guide future studies. In From assessing to conserving biodiversity (pp. 77-106). Springer, Cham. Clandinin, D. J. (2019). Narrative and story in teacher education. In Journeys in Narrative Inquiry (pp. 91-102). Routledge. Coenders, F., & Verhoef, N. (2019). Lesson Study: professional development (PD) for beginning and experienced teachers. Professional development in education, 45(2), 217-230. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Action research. In Research methods in education (pp. 440-456). Routledge. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications. D’Amico, M. M., Algozzine, B., Algozzine, K. M., Correa, V. I., & Muharib, R. (2019). Content-driven Faculty Development in Community College Early Childhood Education Programs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(1), 74-79. Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and teacher education, 36, 1-11. Deterding, N. M., & Waters, M. C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological methods & research, 50(2), 708-739. Dudley, P. (2015). Lesson study. Professional learning for our time. Dymoke, S., & Harrison, J. (2008). Reflective teaching and learning. SAGE Publications Ltd. Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), n1. fomani, M. M., ahari, A. e., & Sharifi, A. (2021). Providing a model of professional ethics for faculty members at Farhangian University. Educational Administration Research Quarterly, 12(1), 271-287. (in Persian). Grant, M.R. and Keim, M. C. (2010). Faculty development in public supported two – year colleges, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 793-807. Guilbaud, T. C., Martin, F., & Newton, X. (2021). Faculty Perceptions on Accessibility in Online Learning: Knowledge, Practice and Professional Development. Online Learning, 25(2), 6-35. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review. Haverz, G. (2021). 5 The Anglo-American Struggle with Strauss. In Leo Strauss and Anglo-American Democracy (pp. 122-152). Cornell University Press. Hejazi, A. (2020). Determining the components of professional development of faculty members of Farhangian University. Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 3(1), 41-61. (in Persian). Jamshidi, L. (2007). The study of faculty members’ growth in a big State university and the way to progress it continuously, (Master's dissertation). Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran (in Persian). Karter, M. J. (1994). Back from the Nikitsky Gates Theater: Reflections on Cross-Cultural Concerns in the Staging of Marsha Norman's' night, Mother in Moscow. Theatre Topics, 4(1), 75-88. Khadivi, a., & Allahverdikhan vaziri, a. (2015). Developing a model for evaluating the effectiveness and performance of university the academic staff of the islamic azad university of east azarbaijan province. Productivity management (beyond management), 9(34). (in Persian). Knowlton, S. Fogleman, J. Reichsman, F. Oliveira, G.D. (2015). Higher Education Faculty Collaboration With K–12 Teachers as a Professional evelopment Experience for Faculty. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). Reprinted with permission from Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 44, No. 4. Loftus, A. (2020). Online Technology Integration Professional Development: Action Research Evaluating Impact on Faculty Perceptions and Practices (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina). Lottering, R. T., Govender, M., Peerbhay, K., & Lottering, S. (2020). Comparing partial least squares (PLS) discriminant analysis and sparse PLS discriminant analysis in detecting and mapping Solanum mauritianum in commercial forest plantations using image texture. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 159, 271-280. Mac Naughton, G. (2020). Action research. In Doing early childhood research (pp. 208-223). Routledge. Marin-García, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2019). Protocol: How to deal with Partial Least Squares (PLS) research in Operations Management. A guide for sending papers to academic journals. Working Papers on Operations Management, 10(1), 29-69. Marzban, Z. (2009). The study of necessity to establish a growth center for faculty members in a big State university: Human Resource. Master's dissertation. Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran (in Persian). Masoumpanah, Z., Tahririan, M. H., Afzali, K., & Alibabaee, A. (2019). An Evaluation of Practicum Courses at Farhangian University. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 101-119. McGowan, V. (2020). Institution initiatives related to faculty development of open educational resources and alternative textbooks. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(1), 24-45. McLean, M., Cilliers, F., & Van Wyk, J. M. (2008). Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Medical teacher, 30(6), 555-584. Mishra (2019). Faculty development in higher education: Long-term impact of a summer teaching and learning workshop, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, No. 1,. 1 – 13. Mohebzadegan, Y., Pardakhtchi, M. H., Ghahramani, M., & Farasatkhah, M. (2014). Developing a Model for Faculty Development Approach based on Grounded Theory [Original]. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19(4), 1-25. (in Persian). Moreno, C. E., Calderón‐Patrón, J. M., Martín‐Regalado, N., Martínez‐Falcón, A. P., Ortega‐Martínez, I. J., Rios‐Díaz, C. L., & Rosas, F. (2018). Measuring species diversity in the tropics: a review of methodological approaches and framework for future studies. Biotropica, 50(6), 929-941. Mukhtar, F., & Chaudhry, A. M. (2010). Faculty development in medical institutions: where do we stand in Pakistan? Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 22(3), 210-213. Muro, P., Enjuanes, J., Morata, T., & Palasí, E. (2016). Health promotion in a prison setting: Experience in Villabona prison. Health Education Journal, 75(6), 712-720. Namdaripejman, m., & Ghorbanian, p., & Ghanbari, s., & Basiri, i. (2017). Effectiveness of lesson study on teachers professional skills in hamadan province exceptional education. Journal of new educational approaches, 12(1), 46-74. (In Persian) Nave Ebrahim, a., & Pourkarimi, j. (2009). presenting a conceptual model for faculty members' development in universities and higher education centers. journal of research in educational systems, 2(5). (in Persian). Power, M. (2008). A dual-mode university instructional design model for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 13 (1), 31-39. Rowbotham, M. A. (2015). The Impact of Faculty Development on Teacher Self-Efficacy, Skills and Perspectives. Policy Research: IERC FFR 2015-1. Illinois Education Research Council. Saki, R., Osareh, A. R., & Shaabani Mashkoul, R. (2015). Investigating the relationship between managers' professional ethic and transformational leadership with teachers' job performance in schools of Malard city. Management and Educational Leadership, 9 (1), 27-50. (in Persian). Salimi,G. Haidari, E. Keshavarzi, F. (2015). Faculty member's Competencies for achieving the academic mission: A reflection from the perceptions and expectations of doctoral students, Journal of Innovation and Enterpreneurship, 3(7), 85-104. magiran.com/p1605844. (in Persian). Sarkar Arani m.r(2017). Lesson study; a global solution for improving teaching and enhancing learning. Meraat Tehran. (in Persian). Sarkar Arani, M. R., Shibata, Y., Cheon, H.-s., Sakamoto, M., & Kuno, H. (2020). Comparison as a Lens: Interpretation of the Cultural Script of a Korean Mathematics Lesson Through the Perspective of International Lesson Study. Educational Practice and Theory, 42(2), 57-78. (in Persian). Steinert, Y., O’Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2019). Strengthening teachers’ professional identities through faculty development. Academic Medicine, 94(7), 963-968. Torkzade, J., Mohammadi, M., Salimi, G., & Forough, B. M. (2017). Academic Empowerment with a Strategic Approach: a Situational Framework for Planning the Development of Bamiyan University, Afghanistan. (in Persian). Wang, Y.-G., Kuhnert, P., & Henderson, B. (2011). Load estimation with uncertainties from opportunistic sampling data–a semiparametric approach. Journal of hydrology, 396(1-2), 148-157. Williams-Smith, R. E. (2017). From good to great: An action research study to improve the new faculty onboarding experience (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 163 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 15 |
||