| تعداد نشریات | 25 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 533 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,160 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,477,574 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,207,289 |
بررسی کجفهمیهای دانشآموزان پایه یازدهم در مفاهیم ایزومری و نامگذاری هیدروکربنها با روش ارزشیابی مفهومی | ||
| پژوهش در آموزش شیمی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 29، فروردین 1405، صفحه 100-123 اصل مقاله (1.13 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.48310/chemedu.2025.18328.1308 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| وحید امانی* 1؛ حکیمه تیموری نیا2 | ||
| 1گروه آموزش شیمی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2پژوهشگر پسادکتری، گروه آموزش شیمی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پیشینه و اهداف: درس شیمی یکی از دروس علوم تجربی است که بسیاری از دانشآموزان برای یادگیری آن با مشکل کجفهمی مواجه هستند. لذا شناخت و رفع کجفهمی آنها در یادگیری شیمی اهمیت زیادی دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی کجفهمیهای دانشآموزان پایه یازدهم درباره مفاهیم ایزومری و نامگذاری هیدروکربنها با روش ارزیابی مفهومی انجام شده است. روشها: نوع پژوهش، بنیادی است و دادههای آن با روش توصیفی پیمایشی گردآوری شد. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل کلیه دانشآموزان پایه یازدهم رشتههای تجربی و ریاضی مدارس شهر تهران و شهرستانهای استان تهران در سال تحصیلی 1404-1403 است. حجم نمونه پژوهش شامل 265 دانشآموز دختر و 283 دانشآموز پسر است که به صورت تصادفی و به روش نمونهگیری به شیوه نمونه در دسترس انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از آزمون تشخیصی حاوی 8 سؤال چهار گزینهای استفاده شد. روایی آزمون توسط 15 نفر از استادان و دبیران شیمی تأیید و با محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به مقدار 84/0، پایایی سؤالات آزمون اثبات شد. تحلیل دادهها با استفاده از نرمافزار IBM SPSS Statistics 26 انجام شد. یافتهها: بازبینی محتوای بخش ایزومری و نامگذاری هیدروکربنهای کتاب درسی شیمی یازدهم و همچنین شیوۀ تدریس معلمان با دقت کافی و توجه ویژه پیشنهاد میشود. نتیجهگیری: نتایج نشان داد که 9/16% و 9/11% دانشآموزان پایه یازدهم بهترتیب در مفاهیم ایزومری و نامگذاری هیدروکربنها دچار کجفهمی هستند. بیشترین کجفهمی در مفهوم ایزومری در زمینه تشخیص ایزومری در گروههای عاملی و در مفهوم نامگذاری هیدروکربنها در زمینه تشخیص زنجیر اصلی شناسایی شد. بررسیها نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین میانگین کجفهمی دانشآموزان دختر و پسر درباره مفاهیم ذکرشده وجود ندارد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارزیابی مفهومی؛ ایزومری؛ دانشآموزان پایه یازدهم؛ کجفهمی؛ نامگذاری هیدروکربنها | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the misconceptions of 11th grade high school students about the concepts of isomerism and naming hydrocarbons using conceptual evaluation method | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Vahid Amani1؛ Hakimeh Teymourinia2 | ||
| 1Department of Chemistry Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Postdoctoral researcher, Department of Chemistry Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background and Objective: Chemistry is one of the experimental sciences in which many students experience difficulties and develop misconceptions during learning. Therefore, identifying and addressing these misconceptions is crucial for effective chemistry education. The present study aimed to identify eleventh-grade students’ misconceptions about the concepts of isomerism and the nomenclature of hydrocarbons using a conceptual assessment approach. Materials and Methods: This study was fundamental in nature, and data were collected through a descriptive survey method. The statistical population included all eleventh-grade students in the experimental sciences and mathematics tracks in schools in Tehran and other cities of Tehran Province during the 2024–2025 academic years. The study sample consisted of 265 female students and 283 male students, selected randomly through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a diagnostic test containing eight multiple-choice questions. The validity of the test was confirmed by 15 chemistry professors and teachers, and the reliability was established using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α = 0.84). Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Findings: It is recommended that the content related to isomerism and hydrocarbon nomenclature in the 11th-grade chemistry textbook, as well as teachers’ instructional methods, be reviewed carefully and with special attention. Conclusion: The results showed that 16.9% and 11.9% of eleventh-grade students held misconceptions about the concepts of isomerism and hydrocarbon nomenclature, respectively. The most common misconceptions in isomerism were related to identifying isomerism in functional groups, while in hydrocarbon nomenclature they were associated with recognizing the main carbon chain. The findings also indicated no significant difference between male and female students in terms of their average misconceptions regarding these concepts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Conceptual evaluation isomerism, 11th grade students, misconceptions, nomenclature of hydrocarbons | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abraham , M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105-120. [Link] Adesoji, F. A., Omilani, N. A., & Dada, S. O. (2017). A comparison of perceived and actual Students’ learning difficulties in physical chemistry. International Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 6, 1-8. [Link] Ahmadabadi, Z. (2020). Study of Misunderstandings of Chemical Bonds Based on Johnston's Triangle Multilevel Thought Model. Research in Chemistry Education, 5(1), 25-40. [Link] Ahmadi, Y., Salehi Aval, M., & Bahrami Maddah, A. M. (2023). A study of secondary school students' misconceptions in learning thermochemistry concepts. Journal of Education Basic Science, 9(31), 7-20. [Link] Akbarpour Ganjeh, A., & Amani, V. (2022). Investigating 12th grade students' misconceptions in acid-base concepts through a three-tiered diagnostic test. Journal of Education Basic Science, 7(25), 59-74. [Link] Amani, V., Akrami, Z., & Omidvar, M. (2025). Investigating the misconceptions of tenth grade students about the concepts of stoichiometry and balancing chemical equations using the conceptual assessment method. Educational and Scholastic studies, 13(4), 317-337. [Link] Asghari Lalami, N., & Amani, V. (2021). Factors Influencing High School and University Students' Misconceptions about Chemical Bonding. Research in Chemistry Education, 3(2), 19-36. [Link] Asipita, P. O., Sunday, Y., Abdulmalij, O., Evinenami, E., Haruna, H. O., Isah, M. U., & Ibrahim, J. (2024). Analysis of misconceptions in organic chemistry among senior secondary school students in adavi Local Government Area of Kogi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education, 1(1), 24-39. [Link] Azmat, J., & Khodai, A. (2019). A study of common misconceptions among students regarding concepts related to chemical bonds. Research in Chemistry Education, 1(4), 73-89. [Link] Badrian, A. (2016). A study of the perceptions and misconceptions of third grade elementary school students about the phenomena of evaporation and condensation. Quarterly Journal of Education, 126(1), 87-112. [Link] Cahyanto, M. A. S., Ashadi, A., & Saputro, S. (2019). An analysis of gender difference on students’ misconceptions in learning the material classification and its changes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 158-168. [Link] Duda, H. J., Wibowo, D. C., Wahyuni, F. R. E., Setyawan, A. E., & Subekti, M. R. (2021). Examines the misconceptions of student's biology education: health biotechnology. Pedagogika, 142(2), 182-199. [Link] Erman, E. (2017). Factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in learning covalent bonds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 520-537. Fadillah, A., & Salirawati, D. (2021). Analysis of Misconceptions of Chemical Bonding among Tenth Grade Senior High School Students Using a Two-Tier Test. The 8th Annual Basic Science International Conference, [Link] Fatmala, E., Lestari, I., & Hairida, E. (2024). Development of Multiple Representation Learning Videos on Hydrocarbon Nomenclature. Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA, 8(3), 249-266. [Link] Habibzadeh, E., Rasekhi, A., & Nikmanesh, R. (2023). Common misconceptions about the concept of combustion among tenth to twelfth grade students. Research in Chemistry Education, 4(4), 67-77. [Link] Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2021). Examining students’ ability to solve algorithmic and pictorial style questions in chemical kinetics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(1), 65-85. [Link] Hanson, R., Taale, K. D., & Antwi, V. (2011). Investigating senior high school students’ conceptions of introductory chemistry concepts. International Journal of Educational Administration, 3(1), 41-57. [Link] Homaei Moghaddam, A., Shahvand, M., & Sadeghi Haji Baba, S. S. (2021). Investigating the Misconceptions of Second-Round High School Students in the Concepts of Mole and Atomic Mass. Research in Chemistry Education, 3(1), 57-74. [Link] Hutahaean, E., Pardiana, P., & Hadiyati, Y. (2024). Identify students' Misconceptions on Electrolysis using Two-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Research in Environmental and Science Education, 1(1), 1-11. [Link] Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83. [Link] Khaki, M., Zamani, E., & Amini, Z. (2021). Students' Misconceptions about Learning Thermodynamics in Second-round High School. Research in Chemistry Education, 3(1), 19-40. [Link] Khanzad, Z., & Nikroshaldehi, N. (2023). Investigating some basic and common misconceptions of tenth grade students in the first chapter of chemistry book. Research in Chemistry Education, 5(3), 43-62. [Link] Kristyasari, M. L., & Kusumaningrum, I. A. (2023). Analysis of misconceptions in view of gender differences in chemistry learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 26(1), 1-9. [Link] Kristyasari, M. L., & Pongkendek, J. J. (2023). Analysis of the effect of gender on high school students' misconceptions. Journal of Educational Chemistry, 5(2), 61-68. [Link] Kumar, S. (2024). Remediation of Chemical Bonding Misconception through Conceptual Change Text. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(3), 63-73. [Link] Lotfi, A., & Mousavi, S. M. (2020). Study of misconceptions of second year high school students in chemical bonding concepts. 11th National Conference on Iranian Chemistry Education, Isfahan. [Link] Molla Ebrahimi, M. R., Razavi, S. A. M., & Amani, V. (2024). A study of common misconceptions of high school students in chemical problems and concepts related to the first chapter of the tenth chemistry textbook. Journal of Education Basic Science, 10(35), 15-37. [Link] Mousavi, S. M., Golestaneh, M., & Tomari, A. (2022). Investigating misunderstandings of ninth grade students about chemical bonds - a case study of students in Robat Karim. Journal of Education Basic Science, 8(27), 39-50. [Link] Mubarokah, F. D., Mulyani, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Identifying students' misconceptions of acid-base concepts using a three-tier diagnostic test: A case of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15, 51-58. [Link] Naghizadeh Sarabi, M. A., & Saadati, M. (2021). A Review of Studies on Students' Common Misconceptions about some Common Concepts in Elementary Science Textbook. Research in Chemistry Education, 3(2), 37-52. [Link] Nouri, R., Hosseini, A. M., & Amani, V. (2019). A study of common misconceptions among high school students and chemistry teacher students in the concepts of chemical kinetics, atomic mass, mole, and solubility. Journal of Education Basic Science, 5(15), 1-13. [Link] Omwirhiren, E. M., & Ubanwa, A. O. (2016). An analysis of misconceptions in organic chemistry among selected senior secondary school students in Zaria local government area of Kaduna state, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(7), 247-266. [Link] Paillusson, F., & Booth, M. (2025). Embracing Representational Plurality to Bypass Misconceptions in Science Education. Science & Education, 34, 1955-1969. [Link] Putica, K. B. (2024). Identification of high-school students' conceptual challenges related to alcohols and carbonyl compounds by means of a four-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(4), 1442-1456. Saadati, M. (2019). Prospective Primary Education Teachers' Misconceptions about Properties of Constituent Particles in Different States of Matter. Research in Chemistry Education, 1(3), 97-129. [Link] Saadati, M., & Khodai, A. (2019). Study of Understanding of Physics Education Students from the Concepts related to the Law of Conservation of Mass and Stoichiometry and Extracting their Misconceptions. Research in Chemistry Education, 1(4), 51-72. [Link] Salame, I. I., & Khalil, A. Y. (2023). Examining some of the challenges students face in learning about rearrangement reactions in organic chemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), e2310. [Link] Seif, A. A. (2007). Educational Psychology: Psychology of Learning and Education. Agah Publishing. Selina, Muharini, R., lestari, I., Masriani, & Rasmawan, R. (2024). Analysis of Understanding the Concept of Alkenes through the Three-tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Instrument. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3463-3472. [Link] Sobhani-Nejad, M., Najafi, H., & Jafari Harandi, R. (2018). Analysis of the position of basic components of citizenship education in the content of primary school social studies textbooks. Teaching and Learning Research, 15(1), 67-78. [Link] Suparman, A. R., Rohaeti, E., & Wening, S. (2024). Student misconception in chemistry: A systematic literature review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 238-252. [Link] Üce, M., & Ceyhan, İ. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202-208. [Link] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 898 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 285 |
||